GeezerVison is showing data-apis.org — array-api-strict documentation
array-api-strict¶
array_api_strict is a strict, minimal implementation of the Python array
API
The purpose of array-api-strict is to provide an implementation of the array
API for consuming libraries to test against so they can be completely sure
their usage of the array API is portable.
It is not intended to be used by end-users. End-users of the array API
should just use their favorite array library (NumPy, CuPy, PyTorch, etc.) as
usual. It is also not intended to be used as a dependency by consuming
libraries. Consuming library code should use the
array-api-compat package to
support the array API. Rather, it is intended to be used in the test suites of
consuming libraries to test their array API usage.
array-api-strict currently supports the
2025.12
version of the standard. Support for previous versions is also implemented,
and can be enabled with a flag.
Install¶
array-api-strict is available on both
PyPI
python -m pip install array-api-strict
and Conda-forge
conda install --channel conda-forge array-api-strict
array-api-strict supports NumPy 1.26 and NumPy 2.0-2.4.
Rationale¶
The array API has many functions and behaviors that are required to be
implemented by conforming libraries, but it does not, in most cases, disallow
implementing additional functions, keyword arguments, and behaviors that
aren’t explicitly required by the standard.
However, this poses a problem for consumers of the array API, as they may
accidentally use a function or rely on a behavior which just happens to be
implemented in every array library they test against (e.g., NumPy and
PyTorch), but isn’t required by the standard and may not be included in other
libraries.
array-api-strict solves this problem by providing a strict, minimal
implementation of the array API standard. Only those functions and behaviors
that are explicitly required by the standard are implemented. For example,
most NumPy functions accept Python scalars as inputs:
>>> import numpy as np
>>> np.sin(0.0)
0.0
However, the standard only specifies function inputs on Array objects. And
indeed, some libraries, such as PyTorch, do not allow this:
>>> import torch
>>> torch.sin(0.0)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
TypeError: sin(): argument 'input' (position 1) must be Tensor, not float
In array-api-strict, this is also an error:
>>> import array_api_strict as xp
>>> xp.sin(0.0)
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
AttributeError: 'float' object has no attribute 'dtype'
Here is an (incomplete) list of the sorts of ways that array-api-strict is
strict/minimal:
Only those functions and methods that are defined in the
standard
are included.
In those functions, only the keyword-arguments that are defined by the
standard are included. All signatures in array-api-strict use
positional-only
arguments.
As noted above, only array_api_strict array objects are accepted by
functions, except in the places where the standard allows Python scalars
(i.e., functions do not automatically call asarray on their inputs).
Only those dtypes that are defined in the
standard
are included.
All functions and methods reject inputs if the standard does not require
the input dtype(s) to be supported. This is one of the most restrictive
aspects of the library. For example, in NumPy, most transcendental functions
like sin will accept integer array inputs, but the standard only requires
them to accept floating-point
inputs,
so in array-api-strict, sin(asarray(0)) will raise an exception.
The
indexing
semantics required by the standard are limited compared to those implemented
by NumPy (e.g., out-of-bounds slices are not supported, integer array
indexing is not supported, only a single boolean array index is supported).
There are no distinct “scalar” objects as in NumPy. There are only 0-D
arrays.
Dtype objects are just empty objects that only implement equality
comparison.
The way to access dtype objects in the standard is by name, like
xp.float32.
The array object type itself is private and should not be accessed.
Subclassing or otherwise trying to directly initialize this object is not
supported. Arrays should be created with one of the array creation
functions
such as asarray.
Optional behavior such as optional
extensions,
functions that use data-dependent shapes, and boolean indexing are enabled
by default but can disabled with the array-api-strict
flags.
Caveats¶
array-api-strict is a thin pure Python wrapper around NumPy. NumPy 2.0 fully
supports the array API but NumPy 1.26 does not, so many behaviors are wrapped
in NumPy 1.26 to provide array API compatible behavior. Although it is based
on NumPy, mixing NumPy arrays with array-api-strict arrays is not supported.
This should generally raise an error, as it indicates a potential portability
issue, but this hasn’t necessarily been tested thoroughly.
array-api-strict is validated against the array API test
suite. However, there may be
a few minor instances where NumPy deviates from the standard in a way that
is inconvenient to workaround in array-api-strict, since it aims to remain
pure Python. You can see the full list of tests that are known to fail in
the xfails
file.
array-api-strict is just a thin, pure Python wrapper around numpy.ndarray
and numpy functions. As such, the performance should be mostly comparable
to NumPy, but nonetheless, performance is not a primary concern for this
library, since it is only intended to be used for testing purposes.
Since NumPy is a CPU-only library, the device
support
in array-api-strict is superficial only.
array-api-strict supports three ‘devices’; the default CPU_DEVICE,
Device("device1") and Device("device2"). This allows testing of arrays on
different devices, without the need for special hardware.
x.device is always a Device object, and device keywords to creation
functions only accept the above three device objects or None. A future version of
array-api-strict may add support for a CuPy
backend so that
more significant device support can be tested.
Although only array types are expected in array-api-strict functions,
currently most functions do not do extensive type checking on their inputs,
so a sufficiently duck-typed object may pass through silently (or at best,
you may get AttributeError instead of TypeError). However, all type
signatures have type annotations (based on those from the standard), so
this deviation may be tested with type checking. This behavior may improve
in the future.
Relationship to numpy.array_api¶
Previously this implementation was available as numpy.array_api, but it was
moved to a separate package for NumPy 2.0.
The history of this repo prior to commit
fbefd42e4d11e9be20e0a4785f2619fc1aef1e7c
was generated automatically from the numpy git history, using the following
git-filter-repo command:
git_filter_repo.py --path numpy/array_api/ --path-rename numpy/array_api:array_api_strict --replace-text <(echo -e "numpy.array_api==>array_api_strict\nfrom ..core==>from numpy.core\nfrom .._core==>from numpy._core\nfrom ..linalg==>from numpy.linalg\nfrom numpy import array_api==>import array_api_strict") --commit-callback 'commit.message = commit.message.rstrip() + b"\n\nOriginal NumPy Commit: " + commit.original_id'
|