GeezerVisonThe World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory. |
| Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites |
GeezerVison is showing docs.python.org — Introduction — Python 2.7.18 documentation
This document is for an old version of Python that is no longer supported.
You should upgrade and read the
Python documentation for the current stable release.
Introduction¶The Application Programmer’s Interface to Python gives C and C++ programmers access to the Python interpreter at a variety of levels. The API is equally usable from C++, but for brevity it is generally referred to as the Python/C API. There are two fundamentally different reasons for using the Python/C API. The first reason is to write extension modules for specific purposes; these are C modules that extend the Python interpreter. This is probably the most common use. The second reason is to use Python as a component in a larger application; this technique is generally referred to as embedding Python in an application. Writing an extension module is a relatively well-understood process, where a “cookbook” approach works well. There are several tools that automate the process to some extent. While people have embedded Python in other applications since its early existence, the process of embedding Python is less straightforward than writing an extension. Many API functions are useful independent of whether you’re embedding or extending Python; moreover, most applications that embed Python will need to provide a custom extension as well, so it’s probably a good idea to become familiar with writing an extension before attempting to embed Python in a real application. Include Files¶All function, type and macro definitions needed to use the Python/C API are included in your code by the following line: #include "Python.h" This implies inclusion of the following standard headers: Note Since Python may define some pre-processor definitions which affect the standard
headers on some systems, you must include All user visible names defined by Python.h (except those defined by the included
standard headers) have one of the prefixes Important: user code should never define names that begin with The header files are typically installed with Python. On Unix, these are
located in the directories To include the headers, place both directories (if different) on your compiler’s
search path for includes. Do not place the parent directories on the search
path and then use C++ users should note that though the API is defined entirely using C, the
header files do properly declare the entry points to be Objects, Types and Reference Counts¶Most Python/C API functions have one or more arguments as well as a return value
of type All Python objects (even Python integers) have a type and a
reference count. An object’s type determines what kind of object it is
(e.g., an integer, a list, or a user-defined function; there are many more as
explained in The standard type hierarchy). For each of the well-known types there is a macro
to check whether an object is of that type; for instance, Reference Counts¶The reference count is important because today’s computers have a finite (and often severely limited) memory size; it counts how many different places there are that have a reference to an object. Such a place could be another object, or a global (or static) C variable, or a local variable in some C function. When an object’s reference count becomes zero, the object is deallocated. If it contains references to other objects, their reference count is decremented. Those other objects may be deallocated in turn, if this decrement makes their reference count become zero, and so on. (There’s an obvious problem with objects that reference each other here; for now, the solution is “don’t do that.”) Reference counts are always manipulated explicitly. The normal way is to use
the macro It is not necessary to increment an object’s reference count for every local variable that contains a pointer to an object. In theory, the object’s reference count goes up by one when the variable is made to point to it and it goes down by one when the variable goes out of scope. However, these two cancel each other out, so at the end the reference count hasn’t changed. The only real reason to use the reference count is to prevent the object from being deallocated as long as our variable is pointing to it. If we know that there is at least one other reference to the object that lives at least as long as our variable, there is no need to increment the reference count temporarily. An important situation where this arises is in objects that are passed as arguments to C functions in an extension module that are called from Python; the call mechanism guarantees to hold a reference to every argument for the duration of the call. However, a common pitfall is to extract an object from a list and hold on to it
for a while without incrementing its reference count. Some other operation might
conceivably remove the object from the list, decrementing its reference count
and possible deallocating it. The real danger is that innocent-looking
operations may invoke arbitrary Python code which could do this; there is a code
path which allows control to flow back to the user from a A safe approach is to always use the generic operations (functions whose name
begins with Reference Count Details¶The reference count behavior of functions in the Python/C API is best explained
in terms of ownership of references. Ownership pertains to references, never
to objects (objects are not owned: they are always shared). “Owning a
reference” means being responsible for calling Py_DECREF on it when the
reference is no longer needed. Ownership can also be transferred, meaning that
the code that receives ownership of the reference then becomes responsible for
eventually decref’ing it by calling Conversely, when a calling function passes in a reference to an object, there are two possibilities: the function steals a reference to the object, or it does not. Stealing a reference means that when you pass a reference to a function, that function assumes that it now owns that reference, and you are not responsible for it any longer. Few functions steal references; the two notable exceptions are
PyObject *t; t = PyTuple_New(3); PyTuple_SetItem(t, 0, PyInt_FromLong(1L)); PyTuple_SetItem(t, 1, PyInt_FromLong(2L)); PyTuple_SetItem(t, 2, PyString_FromString("three")); Here, Incidentally, Equivalent code for populating a list can be written using However, in practice, you will rarely use these ways of creating and populating
a tuple or list. There’s a generic function, PyObject *tuple, *list; tuple = Py_BuildValue("(iis)", 1, 2, "three"); list = Py_BuildValue("[iis]", 1, 2, "three"); It is much more common to use int set_all(PyObject *target, PyObject *item) { int i, n; n = PyObject_Length(target); if (n < 0) return -1; for (i = 0; i < n; i++) { PyObject *index = PyInt_FromLong(i); if (!index) return -1; if (PyObject_SetItem(target, index, item) < 0) { Py_DECREF(index); return -1; } Py_DECREF(index); } return 0; } The situation is slightly different for function return values. While passing
a reference to most functions does not change your ownership responsibilities
for that reference, many functions that return a reference to an object give
you ownership of the reference. The reason is simple: in many cases, the
returned object is created on the fly, and the reference you get is the only
reference to the object. Therefore, the generic functions that return object
references, like It is important to realize that whether you own a reference returned by a
function depends on which function you call only — the plumage (the type of
the object passed as an argument to the function) doesn’t enter into it!
Thus, if you extract an item from a list using Here is an example of how you could write a function that computes the sum of
the items in a list of integers; once using long sum_list(PyObject *list) { int i, n; long total = 0; PyObject *item; n = PyList_Size(list); if (n < 0) return -1; /* Not a list */ for (i = 0; i < n; i++) { item = PyList_GetItem(list, i); /* Can't fail */ if (!PyInt_Check(item)) continue; /* Skip non-integers */ total += PyInt_AsLong(item); } return total; } long sum_sequence(PyObject *sequence) { int i, n; long total = 0; PyObject *item; n = PySequence_Length(sequence); if (n < 0) return -1; /* Has no length */ for (i = 0; i < n; i++) { item = PySequence_GetItem(sequence, i); if (item == NULL) return -1; /* Not a sequence, or other failure */ if (PyInt_Check(item)) total += PyInt_AsLong(item); Py_DECREF(item); /* Discard reference ownership */ } return total; } Types¶There are few other data types that play a significant role in the Python/C
API; most are simple C types such as Exceptions¶The Python programmer only needs to deal with exceptions if specific error handling is required; unhandled exceptions are automatically propagated to the caller, then to the caller’s caller, and so on, until they reach the top-level interpreter, where they are reported to the user accompanied by a stack traceback. For C programmers, however, error checking always has to be explicit. All
functions in the Python/C API can raise exceptions, unless an explicit claim is
made otherwise in a function’s documentation. In general, when a function
encounters an error, it sets an exception, discards any object references that
it owns, and returns an error indicator. If not documented otherwise, this
indicator is either NULL or Exception state is maintained in per-thread storage (this is equivalent to
using global storage in an unthreaded application). A thread can be in one of
two states: an exception has occurred, or not. The function
The full exception state consists of three objects (all of which can be
NULL): the exception type, the corresponding exception value, and the
traceback. These have the same meanings as the Python objects
Note that starting with Python 1.5, the preferred, thread-safe way to access the
exception state from Python code is to call the function As a general principle, a function that calls another function to perform some task should check whether the called function raised an exception, and if so, pass the exception state on to its caller. It should discard any object references that it owns, and return an error indicator, but it should not set another exception — that would overwrite the exception that was just raised, and lose important information about the exact cause of the error. A simple example of detecting exceptions and passing them on is shown in the
def incr_item(dict, key): try: item = dict[key] except KeyError: item = 0 dict[key] = item + 1 Here is the corresponding C code, in all its glory: int incr_item(PyObject *dict, PyObject *key) { /* Objects all initialized to NULL for Py_XDECREF */ PyObject *item = NULL, *const_one = NULL, *incremented_item = NULL; int rv = -1; /* Return value initialized to -1 (failure) */ item = PyObject_GetItem(dict, key); if (item == NULL) { /* Handle KeyError only: */ if (!PyErr_ExceptionMatches(PyExc_KeyError)) goto error; /* Clear the error and use zero: */ PyErr_Clear(); item = PyInt_FromLong(0L); if (item == NULL) goto error; } const_one = PyInt_FromLong(1L); if (const_one == NULL) goto error; incremented_item = PyNumber_Add(item, const_one); if (incremented_item == NULL) goto error; if (PyObject_SetItem(dict, key, incremented_item) < 0) goto error; rv = 0; /* Success */ /* Continue with cleanup code */ error: /* Cleanup code, shared by success and failure path */ /* Use Py_XDECREF() to ignore NULL references */ Py_XDECREF(item); Py_XDECREF(const_one); Py_XDECREF(incremented_item); return rv; /* -1 for error, 0 for success */ } This example represents an endorsed use of the Embedding Python¶The one important task that only embedders (as opposed to extension writers) of the Python interpreter have to worry about is the initialization, and possibly the finalization, of the Python interpreter. Most functionality of the interpreter can only be used after the interpreter has been initialized. The basic initialization function is
On most systems (in particular, on Unix and Windows, although the details are
slightly different), For instance, if the Python executable is found in
The embedding application can steer the search by calling
Sometimes, it is desirable to “uninitialize” Python. For instance, the
application may want to start over (make another call to
Debugging Builds¶Python can be built with several macros to enable extra checks of the interpreter and extension modules. These checks tend to add a large amount of overhead to the runtime so they are not enabled by default. A full list of the various types of debugging builds is in the file
Compiling the interpreter with the In addition to the reference count debugging described below, the following extra checks are performed:
There may be additional checks not mentioned here. Defining Please refer to
© Copyright 1990-2020, Python Software Foundation.
The Python Software Foundation is a non-profit corporation. Please donate. Last updated on Jun 19, 2020. Found a bug? Created using Sphinx 2.3.1. |
| You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up. Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required. |