GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • View all journals
  • Saved research
  • Account
  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  • nature
  • letters
  • Metrics details
  • Learn about institutional subscriptions
  • Read our FAQs
  • Contact customer support
  • Research articles

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing www.nature.com — Exceptional sperm cooperation in the wood mouse - Nature

Abstract

Spermatozoa from a single male will compete for fertilization of ova with spermatozoa from another male when present in the female reproductive tract at the same time1. Close genetic relatedness predisposes individuals towards altruism, and as haploid germ cells of an ejaculate will have genotypic similarity of 50%, it is predicted that spermatozoa may display cooperation and altruism to gain an advantage when inter-male sperm competition is intense2. We report here the probable altruistic behaviour of spermatozoa in an eutherian mammal. Spermatozoa of the common wood mouse, Apodemus sylvaticus, displayed a unique morphological transformation resulting in cooperation in distinctive aggregations or ‘trains’ of hundreds or thousands of cells, which significantly increased sperm progressive motility. Eventual dispersal of sperm trains was associated with most of the spermatozoa undergoing a premature acrosome reaction. Cells undergoing an acrosome reaction in aggregations remote from the egg are altruistic in that they help sperm transport to the egg but compromise their own fertilizing ability.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Access through your institution

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

$199.00 per year only $3.90 per issue
Learn more

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Morphology of wood mouse sperm head.
Figure 2: Development of sperm train.
Figure 3: The change in progressive motility (average path velocity) of sperm trains (solid line) and single spermatozoa (dotted line) with increasing viscosity of medium.
Figure 4: Histogram of the proportion of spermatozoa displaying deployment of the apical hook, the acrosome reaction and hyperactivated motility in relation to sperm aggregation in vitro at different time points.

Similar content being viewed by others

Beyond swimming: emerging parameters for predicting the fertility of mouse spermatozoa

Article Open access 26 November 2025

A side-by-side comparison of different capacitation media in developing mouse sperm fertilizing ability

Article Open access 21 June 2024

Ranking parameters driving siring success during sperm competition in the North African houbara bustard

Article Open access 22 March 2023

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news in related subjects.
  • Sexual Selection and Sperm Competition Dynamics

References

  1. Birkhead, T. R. & Moller, A. P. Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection (Academic, London, 1996)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Trivers, R. Social Evolution (Benjamin Cummings, California, 1985)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sivinski, J. in Sperm Competition and the Evolution of Animal Mating Systems (ed. Smith, R. L.) 223–249 (Academic, Orlando, 1984)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hayashi, F. Insemination through an externally attached spermatophore: bundled sperm and post-copulatory mate guarding by male fishflies (Megaloptera: corydalidae). J. Insect Physiol. 42, 859–866 (1996)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Moore, H. D. Gamete biology of the new world marsupial, the grey short-tailed opossum, Monodelphis domestica. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 8, 605–615 (1996)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hamilton, W. D. The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. J. Theor. Biol. 7, 1–16 (1964)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Shepherd, B. A. & Martan, J. Morphology and fertility of guinea-pig spermatozoa aged in vivo. Arch. Androl. 2, 53–58 (1979)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Baker, R. R. & Bellis, M. A. Kamikaze sperm in mammals? Anim. Behav. 36, 936–939 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Baker, R. R. & Bellis, M. A. Human Sperm Competition (Chapman Hall, London, 1995)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Moore, H. D., Martin, M. & Birkhead, T. R. No evidence for killer sperm or other selective interactions between human spermatozoa in ejaculates of different males in vitro. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266, 2243–2350 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hanak, V. & Mazak, V. Mammals (Aventinum, Prague, 1979)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Breed, W. G. & Taylor, J. Body mass, testes mass and sperm size in murine rodents. J. Mamm. 81, 758–768 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bedford, J. M. in The Spermatozoon (eds Fawcett, D. W. & Bedford, J. M.) 7–21 (Urban and Schwarzenberg, Baltimore, 1979)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Harcourt, A. H., Harver, P. H., Larson, S. G. & Short, R. V. Testes weight, body weight and breeding systems in primates. Nature 293, 55–57 (1981)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tew, T. E. & Macdonald, D. W. Dynamics of space use and male vigor amongst wood mice, Apodemus sylvaticus in the cereal ecosystem. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 34, 337–345 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yanagimachi, R. in Physiology of Reproduction (eds Knobil, E. & Neil, J.) 189–317 (Raven Press, New York, 1994)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Friend, G. F. The sperms of British muridae. Quart. J. Micro. Sci. 78, 419–443 (1936)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Moore, H. D., Hartman, T. D., Brown, A. C., Smith, C. A. & Ellis, D. A. Expression of sperm antigens during spermatogenesis and maturation detected with monoclonal antibodies. Exp. Clin. Immunogenet. 2, 84–96 (1985)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Fraser, L. R. & Drury, L. M. The relationship between sperm concentration and fertilisation in vitro of mouse eggs. Biol. Reprod. 13, 513–518 (1975)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Moore, H. D. & Akhondi, M. A. Fertilizing capacity of rat spermatozoa is correlated with decline in straight-line velocity measured by continuous computer-aided sperm analysis. J. Androl. 17, 50–60 (1996)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Holt, C., Holt, W. V., Moore, H. D., Reed, H. C. & Curnock, R. M. Objectively measured boar sperm parameters correlate with the outcome of on-farm inseminations. Results of two fertility trials. J. Androl. 18, 312–323 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Birkhead, T. R., Martinez, J. G., Burke, T. & Froman, D. P. Sperm mobility determines the outcome of sperm competition in the domestic fowl. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266, 1–6 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Dawkins, R. The Selfish Gene (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1976)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Haig, D. Gestational drive and green-bearded placenta. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 6547–6551 (1996)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. De Kretser, D. M. & Kerr, J. B. in Physiology of Reproduction (eds Knobil, E. & Neil, J.) 1177–1290 (Raven Press, New York, 1994)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kleene, K. C. A possible meiotic function of the peculiar patterns of gene expression in mammalian spermatogenic cells. Mech. Dev. 106, 3–23 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kim, E., Waters, S. H., Hake, L. E. & Hecht, N. B. Identification and developmental expression of a smooth muscle gamma-actin in post-meiotic male germ cells of mice. Mol. Cell Biol. 9, 1875–1881 (1989)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Xu, X., Toselli, P. A., Russell, L. D. & Seldin, D. C. Globozoospermia in mice lacking the casein kinase II α catalytic subunit. Nature Genet. 23, 118–121 (1999)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Wassarman, P. M., Jovine, L. & Litscher, E. S. A profile of fertilization in mammals. Nature Cell Biol. 3, E59–E64 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J. Waters for advice on wood mice husbandry. K.D. was supported by an Erasmus Exchange studentship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Section of Reproductive and Developmental Medicine, University of Sheffield, S10 2UH, UK

    Harry Moore & Nicholas Jenkins

  2. Department of Developmental Biology, Charles University, 2, 128 44, Prague, Czech Republic

    Katerina Dvoráková

  3. Department of Anatomical Sciences, University of Adelaide, South Australia, SA5005, Australia

    William Breed

Authors
  1. Harry Moore
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Katerina Dvoráková
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nicholas Jenkins
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. William Breed
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harry Moore.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moore, H., Dvoráková, K., Jenkins, N. et al. Exceptional sperm cooperation in the wood mouse. Nature 418, 174–177 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature00832

Download citation

  • Received: 01 March 2002

  • Accepted: 23 April 2002

  • Issue date: 11 July 2002

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature00832

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.