GeezerVisonThe World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory. |
| Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites |
GeezerVison is showing www.cambridge.org — Development of Gender Classifications: Modeling the Historical Change from Latin to French | Language | Cambridge Core Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-cbk24 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T23:59:30.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Article contentsDevelopment of Gender Classifications: Modeling the Historical Change from Latin to FrenchPublished online by Cambridge University Press: 19 February 2026
AbstractWe present and analyze the results of a connectionist simulation which modeled the reanalysis of the Latin gender system in its transition to Old French. The network reanalysis was based solely on formal cues (word endings and analogy with other words) and on frequency. The results are in accordance with the historical data, and certain errors in simulations are also amenable to principled explanations. Simulations improve dramatically when the networks incorporate information about the Celtic substrate which presumably interfered with gender assignment in Gallo-Romance. This finding has a bearing on issues of gender assignment and processing in bilinguals. Simulations also improve with the introduction of more elaborate recurrent networks, which suggests implications for future connectionist modeling. In particular, the results could be applied to the modeling of gender change in other Romance languages and to the modeling of comparative Romance gender systems. The method proposed here would be advantageous for such simulations since it allows the modeler to take into account a rich variety of facts reflecting actual linguistic history. Information
Access optionsGet access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)Article purchaseTemporarily unavailableReferencesAllopenna, Paul D., Magnuson, James S.; and Tanenhaus, Michael K. 1998. Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using eye movements: Evidence for continuous mapping models. Journal of Memory and Language 38. 419–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Andersen, Roger. 1984. What's gender good for anyway? Second languages: A cross-linguistic perspective, ed. by Andersen, Roger, 77–100. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar Ayres-Bennett, Wendy. 1996. A history of the French language through texts. London: Routledge.Google Scholar Batali, John. 1998. Computational simulations of the emergence of grammar. Approaches to the evolution of language: Social and cognitive bases, ed. by Hurford, James R., Studdert-Kennedy, Michael, and Knight, Chris, 405–26. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar Bidot, E. 1925. La clef du genre des substantifs français. Méthode dispensant d'avoir recours au dictionnaire. Poitier: Impr. Nouvelle.Google Scholar Brighton, Henry. 2002. Compositional syntax from cultural transmission. Artificial Life 8. 25–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed Bybee, Joan. 1985. Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Bybee, Joan. 1995. Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes 10. 425–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Carroll, Susanne E. 1995. The hidden dangers of computer modeling: Remarks on Sokolik and Smith's connectionist learning model of French gender. Second Language Research 11. 193–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Chomsky, Noam, and Halle, Morris. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar Corbett, Greville. 1982. Gender in Russian: An account of gender specification and its relationship to declension. Russian Linguistics 6. 197–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Craig, Colette (ed.) 1986. Noun classes and categorization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar de Gorog, Ralph. 1982. Dictionnaire inverse de l'ancien français. Binghamton, NY: Center for Medieval & Early Renaissance Studies.Google Scholar Demuth, Katherine, Faraclas, Nicolas; and Marchese, Lynell. 1986. Niger-Congo class and agreement systems in language acquisition and historical change. In Craig, 453–72.Google Scholar Diederich, Paul B. 1939. The frequency of Latin words and their endings. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar Dottin, Georges. 1920. La langue gauloise: Grammaire, texts et glossaire. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar Elman, Jeffrey L. 1990. Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science 14. 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Elman, Jeffrey L. 1992. Grammatical structure and distributed representations. Connectionism: Theory and practice, ed. by Davis, Steven, 138–78. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar Ernout, Alfred, and Meillet, Antoine. 1939. Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue latine, histoire des mots. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar Fletcher, P. C., Anderson, J. M., Shanks, D. R., Honey, R., Carpenter, T. A., Donovan, T., Papadakis, N.; and Bullmore, E. T. 2001. Responses of human frontal cortex to surprising events are predicted by formal associative learning theory. Nature Neuroscience 4. 1043–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed Gasser, Michael. 1993. Learning words in time: Towards a modular connectionist account of the acquisition of receptive morphology. Indiana, IN: Computer Science TR-384.Google Scholar Grosjean, François. 2000. The bilingual's language modes. One mind, two languages: Bilingual language processing, ed. by Nicol, Janet, 31–55. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar Guillemon, Delphine, and Grosjean, François. 2000. The gender effect in spoken word recognition: The case of bilinguals. Neuchâtel: University of Neuchâtel, ms.Google Scholar Hare, Mary, and Elman, Jeffrey L. 1995. Learning and morphological change. Cognition 56. 61–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed Härmä, Juhani. 2000. Gender in French: A diachronic perspective. Gender in grammar and cognition, ed. by Unterbeck, Barbara, Rissanen, Matti, Nervalainen, Terttu, and Saari, Mirja, 609–19. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar Harvey, Mark, and Reid, Nicholas (eds.) 1997. Nominal classification in Aboriginal Australia. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Hockett, Charles F. 1958. A course in modern linguistics. New York: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Jackson, Dan, and Cottrell, Garrison. 1997. Attention and U-shaped learning in the acquisition of the past tense. Proceedings of the Nineteenth Cognitive Science Conference, 325–30. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar Joseph, Brian. 1979. On the animate-inanimate distinction in Cree. Anthropological Linguistics 21. 351–54.Google Scholar Jusczyk, Peter W., Friederici, Angela, Wessels, Jeanine, Svenkerud, Vigdis Y.; and Jusczyk, Ann-Marie. 1993. Infants' sensitivity to the sound patterns of native language words. Journal of Memory and Language 32. 402–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Jusczyk, Peter W., Luce, Paul A.; and Charles-Luce, Jan. 1994. Infants' sensitivity to phonotactic patterns in native language. Journal of Memory and Language 33. 630–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Karmiloff-Smith, Annette. 1979. A functional approach to child language: A study of determiners and reference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar Kirby, Simon. 1999. Function, selection, and innateness: The emergence of language universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Kirby, Simon. 2002. Natural language from Artificial Life. Artificial Life 8. 185–215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Lapointe, Steven G. 1988. Towards a unified theory of agreement. Agreement in natural language, ed. by Barlow, Michael and Ferguson, Charles, 67–87. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar Lejeune, Michel. 1985. Recueil des inscriptions gauloises. T. 1: Textes gallo-grecs. Paris: Editions du Centre national de la recherche scientifique.Google Scholar Lejeune, Michel. 1988. Recueil des inscriptions gauloises. T. 2: Textes gallo-étrusques, textes gallo-latins sur pierre. Paris: Éditions du Centre national de la recherche scientifique.Google Scholar Lejeune, Michel, Bachellery, Edouard, Bader, Françoise; and Bemont, Colette. 1985. Textes gaulois et gallo-romains en cursive latine, III: Le Plomb du Larzac. Études celtiques 22. 95–177.Google Scholar Lewis, Charlton T., and Short, Charles. 1962. A Latin dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar Ling, Charles X. 1994. Learning the past tense of English verbs: The symbolic pattern associator vs. connectionist models. Journal of Artificial Intelligence 1. 209–29.Google Scholar MacWhinney, Brian, and Leinbach, Jared. 1991. Implementations are not conceptualizations: Revising the verb learning model. Cognition 40. 121–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Malkiel, Yakov. 1975. Gender, sex, and size, as reflected in the Romance languages. Studies in Romance linguistics, ed. by Hagiwara, Michio P., 254–77. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar Mandler, Jean. 2000. Perceptual and conceptual processes in infancy. Journal of Cognition and Development 1. 3–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Marcus, Gary F., Ullman, Michael, Pinker, Steven, Hollander, Michelle, Rosen, T. John; and Xu, Fei. 1992. Overregularization in language acquisition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 57.4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar McKitterick, Rosamond. 1989. The Carolingians and the written word. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Meillet, Antoine. 1966. Esquisse d'une histoire de la langue latine. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar Mel'čuk, Igor A. 1974. Statistics and the relationship between the gender of French nouns and their endings. Essays on lexical semantics 1, ed. by Rozencvejg, Victor Ju., 11–42. Stockholm: Skriptor.Google Scholar Meyer-Lübke, Wilhelm. 1923. Grammaire des langues romanes, t. 2: Morphologie. New York: G. E. Stechert.Google Scholar Moder, Carol. 1992. Productivity and categorization in morphological classes. Buffalo, NY: SUNY dissertation.Google Scholar Mylne, Tom. 1995. Grammatical category and world view: Western colonization of the Dyirbal language. Cognitive Linguistics 6. 379–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Nichols, Johanna. 1989. The Nakh evidence for the history of gender in Nakh-Daghestanian. The non-Slavic languages of the USSR: Linguistic studies NSL-5, ed. by Aronson, Howard I., 158–75. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar Pedersen, Holger. 1913. Vergleichende Grammatik der keltischen Sprachen. Bd. 2. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht.Google Scholar Plaut, David C. 1999. Computational modeling of word reading, acquired dyslexia, and remediation. Converging methods in reading and dyslexia, ed. by Klein, Raymond M. and McMullen, Patricia A., 339–72. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar Plunkett, Kim, and Marchman, Virginia. 1991. U-shaped learning and frequency effects in a multilayered perceptron: Implications for child language acquisition. Cognition 38. 43–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Plunkett, Kim, and Marchman, Virginia. 1993. From rote learning to system building: Acquiring verb morphology in children and connectionist nets. Cognition 48. 21–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed Polinsky, Maria, and Jackson, Dan. 1999. Noun classes: Language change and learning. Cognition and function in language, ed. by Fox, Barbara, Jurafsky, Dan, and Michaelis, Laura, 29–50. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar Pope, Mildred K. 1961. From Latin to Modern French. Manchester: University of Manchester Press.Google Scholar Rumelhart, David E., McClelland, James L.; and the PDP Research Group (eds.) 1986. Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Vol. 1: Foundations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar Saffran, Jenny R., Aslin, Richard N.; and Newport, Elissa L. 1996. Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science 274. 1926–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed Saffran, Jenny R., Newport, Elissa L.; and Aslin, Richard N. 1996. Word segmentation: The role of distributional cues. Journal of Memory and Language 35. 606–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Sankoff, Gillian. 1980. The social life of language. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Slobin, Dan I. 1973. Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. Studies of child language development, ed. by Ferguson, Charles and Slobin, Dan I., 175–208. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar Slobin, Dan I. (ed.) 1985. The cross-linguistic study of language acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar Smith, Philip T. 1995. Are morphemes really necessary? Morphological aspects of language processing, ed. by Feldman, Laurie Beth, 365–82. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar Sokolik, M. E., and Smith, Michael E. 1992. Assignment of gender to French nouns in primary and secondary language: A connectionist model. Second Language Research 8. 39–58.Google Scholar Taeschner, Traute. 1983. The sun is feminine: A study on language acquisition in bilingual children. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Thomason, Sarah G., and Kaufman, Terrence. 1988. Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Tucker, G. Richard, Lambert, Wallace E.; and Rigault, André A. 1977. The French speaker's skill with grammatical gender: An example of rule-governed behavior. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar van Berkum, Jos J. A., Brown, Colin M.; and Hagoort, Peter. 1999. When does gender constrain parsing? Evidence from ERPs. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 28. 555–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Van Everbroeck, Ezra. 2003. Language type frequency and learnability from a connectionist perspective. Linguistic Typology 7. 1–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Vincent, Nigel. 1988. Latin. The Romance languages, ed. by Harris, Martin and Vincent, Nigel, 26–78. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar Wagner, Robert Leon. 1974. L'Ancien français: points de vue, programmes. Paris: Larousse.Google Scholar Walsh, Michael. 1993. Classifying the world in an Aboriginal language. Language and culture in Aboriginal Australia, ed. by Walsh, Michael and Yallop, Colin, 107–22. Canberra: Aboriginal Studies Press.Google Scholar Wartburg, Walther von. 1888 [1962]. Evolution et structure de la langue française. 6. edn. Berne: A. Francke.Google Scholar Whatmough, Joshua. 1963. The dialects of Ancient Gaul: Grammar, vol. 1. Ann Arbor: Edwards Brothers.Google Scholar Whatmough, Joshua. 1970. The dialects of Ancient Gaul. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Wicha, Nicole Y. Y. 2002. Grammatical gender in real-time language comprehension in Spanish: Behavioral and electrophysiological investigations. La Jolla, CA: University of California, San Diego, dissertation.Google Scholar Wicha, Nicole Y. Y., Moreno, Eva M.; and Kutas, Marta. 2003. Expecting gender: Event related brain potentials to the expectation of a specific gender marked article in a Spanish sentence. Cortex 39, to appear.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Wright, Roger. 1982. Late Latin and Early Romance in Spain and Carolingian France. Liverpool: Francis Cairns.Google Scholar Zubin, David A., and Köpcke, Klaus-Michael. 1986. Gender and folk taxonomy: The indexical relation between grammatical and lexical categorization. In Craig, 139–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Advertisement Save article to KindleTo send this article to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about saving to your Kindle. Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply. Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service. Development of Gender Classifications: Modeling the Historical Change from Latin to French
Save article to DropboxTo save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox. Development of Gender Classifications: Modeling the Historical Change from Latin to French
Save article to Google DriveTo save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive. Development of Gender Classifications: Modeling the Historical Change from Latin to French
×
Reply to: Submit a response
Contents help
Please enter your response.
Your detailsYou have entered the maximum number of contributorsConflicting interestsDo you have any conflicting interests? * Conflicting interests help |
| You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up. Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required. |
