GeezerVisonThe World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory. |
| Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites |
GeezerVison is showing www.cambridge.org — Archaism or Tradition?: The Decapitation Theme in Cupisnique and Moche Iconography | Latin American Antiquity | Cambridge Core Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-kwt9d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T08:32:24.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Article contentsArchaism or Tradition?: The Decapitation Theme in Cupisnique and Moche IconographyPublished online by Cambridge University Press: 20 January 2017
AbstractThe Cupisnique (ca. 1000-200 B. C.) and the Moche (ca. 100 B. C.-A. D. 800) inhabited much of the same territory of Peru's north coast in Precolumbian times, and both are noted for their extraordinary and distinct artistry. Despite the distinctiveness of the two art styles, various similarities between them have been noted. One investigation concluded that archaistic copying was the explanation for the similarities (Rowe 1971). In contrast, the present study arrives at the opposite interpretation: that the Moche knew the symbolic content of the earlier images and retained it. Decapitation is a concept that is essentially pan-Andean and, therefore, it is not surprising that both the Cupisnique and the Moche subscribed to it. What is surprising, particularly in view of the universality of the idea, is that both groups employed virtually the same cast of characters. This paper demonstrates a continuity of belief between Cupisnique and Moche societies through an investigation of the Decapitator theme. Los cupisnique (ca. 1000-200 A. C.) y los moche (ca. 100 A. C.-800 D. C.) habitaron en gran medida el mismo territorio de la costa norte del Perú en la época precolombina. Ambos pueblos son notorios por lo extraordinario y peculiar de su arte. A pesar de lo distintivo de sus estilos artísticos, también se han señalado varias similitudes. Rowe (1971) explicó esas similitudes resaltando el arcaismo del arte Moche. En contraste, el presente estudio llega a la conclusión opuesta: que los moche conocían el contenido simbólico de las imágenes tempranas y lo retuvieron. La decapitación es un concepto básicamente pan-andino y, por siguiente, no es una sorpresa que ambos los cupisnique y los moche lo utilizaran. Lo que sorprende particularmente a luz de la universalidad de la idea, es que ambos grupos utilizaran el mismo reparto de personajes. Este trabajo demuestra una continuidad de las creencias entre las sociedades cupisnique y moche a través del estudio del tema de la decapitación. Information
Access optionsGet access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)Article purchaseTemporarily unavailableReferencesReferences CitedAlva, W.
1988
Discovering the New World’s Richest Unlooted Tomb. National Geographic
174(4):510–549.Google Scholar Castillo, L. J.
1989
Personajes míticos, escenas y narraciones en la iconografia mochica.
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Fondo Editorial, Lima.Google Scholar Cordy-Collins, A.
1977
Chavin Art: Its Shamanic/Hallucinogenic Origins. In Pre-Columbian Art History: Selected Readings, vol. 1, edited by A. Cordy-Collins and J. Stern, pp. 353–362. Peek Publications, Palo Alto, California.Google Scholar Cordy-Collins, A.
1979
Cotton and the Staff God: Analysis of an Ancient Chavín Textile. In The Junius B. Bird Pre-Columbian Textile Conference, edited by A. P. Rowe, E. P. Benson, and A-L. Schaffer, pp. 51–60. The Textile Museum and Dumbarton Oaks, Washington, D.C.
Google Scholar Cordy-Collins, A.
1980a
An Artistic Record of the Chavín Hallucinatory Experience. The Masterkey
54(3):84–93.Google Scholar Cordy-Collins, A.
1980b
The Dual Divinity Concept in Chavin Art. El Dorado
111(2):1–31.Google Scholar Cordy-Collins, A.
1982
Psychoactive Painted Peruvian Plants: The Shamanism Textile. Journal of Ethnobiology
2:144–153.Google Scholar Cordy-Collins, A.
1988
The Jaguar of the Backward Glance. Ms. on file, Department of Anthropology/Sociology, University of San Diego, San Diego.Google Scholar Donnan, C. B.
1978
Moche Art of Peru: Pre-Columbian Symbolic Communication. Fowler Museum of Cultural History, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar Donnan, C. B.
1988
Unraveling the Mystery of the Warrior Priest. National Geographic
174(4):551–555.Google Scholar Donnan, C. B.
1990
Masterworks Reveal a Pre-Inca World. National Geographic
177(6):17–33.Google Scholar Donnan, C. B.
1992
New Insights from the Art and Archaeology of San José de Moro. Paper presented at the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Institute of Andean Studies, Berkeley.Google Scholar Isbell, W. H., and Cook, A. G.
1987
Ideological Origins of the Andean Conquest State. Archaeology
40(4):27–33.Google Scholar Lathrap, D. W.
1977
Thoughts on the Subsistence Basis of Chavín. In Pre-Columbian Art History: Selected Readings, vol. 1, edited by A. Cordy-Collins and J. Stern, pp. 333–351. Peek Publications, Palo Alto, California.Google Scholar Mackey, C. J., and Hastings, C. M.
1982
Moche Murals from the Huaca de la Luna. In Pre-Columbian Art History: Selected Readings, vol. 2, edited by A. Cordy-Collins, pp. 293–312. Peek Publications, Palo Alto, California.Google Scholar Moseley, M. E.
1985
The Exploration and Explanation of Early Monumental Architecture in the Andes. In Early Monumental Architecture in the Andes, edited by C. B. Donnan, pp. 29–58. Dumbarton Oaks, Washington, D.C.
Google Scholar Roe, P. G.
1974
A Further Exploration of the Rowe Chavín Seriation and Its Implications for North Central Coast Chronology. Studies in Pre-Columbian Art and Archaeology No. 13. Dumbarton Oaks, Washington, D.C.
Google Scholar Rowe, J. H.
1962
Chavín Art: An Inquiry into Its Form and Meaning.
Museum of Primitive Art, New York.Google Scholar Rowe, J. H.
1971
The Influence of Chavin Art on Later Styles. In Dumbarton Oaks Conference on Chavín, edited by E. P. Benson, pp. 101–124. Dumbarton Oaks, Washington, D.C.
Google Scholar Salazar Burger, L., and Burger, R. L.
1982
La araña en la iconografia del Horizonte Temprano en la costa norte del Perú. Beitrage zur Allgemeinen und Verleichenden Archäologie
4:213–253.Google Scholar
Advertisement Save article to KindleTo send this article to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about saving to your Kindle. Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply. Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service. Archaism or Tradition?: The Decapitation Theme in Cupisnique and Moche Iconography
Save article to DropboxTo save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox. Archaism or Tradition?: The Decapitation Theme in Cupisnique and Moche Iconography
Save article to Google DriveTo save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive. Archaism or Tradition?: The Decapitation Theme in Cupisnique and Moche Iconography
×
Reply to: Submit a response
Contents help
Please enter your response.
Your detailsYou have entered the maximum number of contributorsConflicting interestsDo you have any conflicting interests? * Conflicting interests help |
| You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up. Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required. |
