CSS Cascading and Inheritance Module Level 3 Disposition of Comments for 2016-05-19 CR

Review document: https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/CR-css-cascade-3-20160519/

Editor's draft: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-cascade-3/

The following color coding convention is used for comments:

• Accepted or Rejected and positive response
• Rejected and no response
• Rejected and negative response
• Deferred
• Out-of-Scope or Invalid and not verified

Open issues are marked like this

An issue can be closed as Accepted, OutOfScope, Invalid, Rejected, or Retracted. Verified indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.

Issue 1. #
Summary:  Link syntactic combinators to definitions in CSS Values
From:     Sebastian Zartner
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/142
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/5919ac659a7bd197012feeb9e2fee24cefdaf880
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: Commenter submitted patch
Resolved: Editorial

Issue 2. #
Summary:  Missing verb
From:     Chris Rebert
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/154
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/609e74c89d3ff3e643456a917ffbba56764cd6a1
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial

Issue 3. #
Summary:  Add Changes since CSS2 section
From:     Tantek Çelik
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/617
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/e9ecba7e0293c5c150d3c6ae1559da5194cb89a3
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial

Issue 4. #
Summary:  Add Security & Privacy appendix
From:     Sebastian Zartner
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/620#event-1694518584
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/620#issuecomment-410393057
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/651c12aba2cf71bc28ea86c67936b255d4db8f55
Review:   https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Aug/0018.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial

Issue 5. #
Summary:  Remove scoped styles
From:     Fùqiáo Xuē
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/637
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/637#issuecomment-290554522
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/d6f12d2e0b3bd217a1c7004d95d216a7deb1c19f
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0069.html

Issue 6. #
Summary:  Improve example
From:     Fùqiáo Xuē
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/664
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/09f68b46d109d5175bbb3fb33a5b68a67bad2433
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial

Issue 7. #
Summary:  Resetting omitted sub-properties to initial value not interoperable
From:     Xidorn Quan
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1068#issuecomment-284576018
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1068#issuecomment-284574521
Closed:   Invalid
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1068#issuecomment-284576018
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1068#issuecomment-284629071

Issue 8. #
Summary:  Add CanIUSe panels
From:     Chris Rebert
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1259
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/2873e666cf865da58df2c823fc3d311e10ff5610
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial

Issue 9. #
Summary:  Override declarations don't really exist anymore
From:     Ilya Streltsyn
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1385
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1385#issuecomment-314711293
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/754128193a308cff72d2f13244b497bf870a303b
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Nov/0001.html

Issue 10. #
Summary:  Precedence of author !important and animations not interoperable
From:     Ilya Streltsyn
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1658
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1658#issuecomment-318708526
Closed:   Rejected
Resolved: Editor discretion
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1658#issuecomment-327238690

Issue 11. #
Summary:  Specified Values section ends in partial sentence
From:     Amelia Bellamy-Royds
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1890
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1890#issuecomment-337708590
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/7ad6a7e76ec10d538298b4056ea0ef99a406651f
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial