GeezerVison

This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages) This article needs more citations. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Location parameter" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (February 2020) (Learn how and when to remove this message) This article's factual accuracy is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please help to ensure that disputed statements are reliably sourced. (July 2021) (Learn how and when to remove this message) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

In statistics, a location parameter of a probability distribution is a scalar- or vector-valued parameter $x_0$, which determines the "location" or shift of the distribution. In the literature of location parameter estimation, the probability distributions with such parameter are found to be formally defined in one of the following equivalent ways:

• either as having a probability density function or probability mass function $f(x-x_0)$;^[1] or
• having a cumulative distribution function $F(x-x_0)$;^[2] or
• being defined as resulting from the random variable transformation $x_0+X$, where $X$ is a random variable with a certain, possibly unknown, distribution.^[3] See also § Additive noise.

A direct example of a location parameter is the parameter $\mu$ of the normal distribution. To see this, note that the probability density function $f\left(x\right|\mu ,\sigma )$ of a normal distribution $𝒩(\mu ,{\sigma }^2)$ can have the parameter $\mu$ factored out and be written as: $g(x^{\prime }=x-\mu |\sigma )=\frac{1}{\sigma \sqrt{2\pi }}\exp (-\frac{1}{2}{\left(\frac{x^{\prime }}{\sigma }\right)}^2)$ thus fulfilling the first of the definitions given above.

The above definition indicates, in the one-dimensional case, that if $x_0$ is increased, the probability density or mass function shifts rigidly to the right, maintaining its exact shape.

A location parameter can also be found in families having more than one parameter, such as location–scale families. In this case, the probability density function or probability mass function will be a special case of the more general form $f_{x_0,\theta }\left(x\right)=f_{\theta }(x-x_0)$ where $x_0$ is the location parameter, θ represents additional parameters, and $f_{\theta }$ is a function parametrized on the additional parameters.

Source:^[4]

Let $f\left(x\right)$ be any probability density function and let $\mu$ and $\sigma >0$ be any given constants. Then the function

$g\left(x\right|\mu ,\sigma )=\frac{1}{\sigma }f\left(\frac{x-\mu }{\sigma }\right)$

is a probability density function.

The location family is then defined as follows:

Let $f\left(x\right)$ be any probability density function. Then the family of probability density functions $ℱ=\left\{f\right(x-\mu ):\mu \in ℝ\}$ is called the location family with standard probability density function $f\left(x\right)$, where $\mu$ is called the location parameter for the family.

An alternative way of thinking of location families is through the concept of additive noise. If $x_0$ is a constant and W is random noise with probability density $f_W\left(w\right),$ then $X=x_0+W$ has probability density $f_{x_0}\left(x\right)=f_W(x-x_0)$ and its distribution is therefore part of a location family.

For the continuous univariate case, consider a probability density function $f\left(x\right|\theta ),x\in [a,b]\subset ℝ$, where $\theta$ is a vector of parameters. A location parameter $x_0$ can be added by defining: $g\left(x\right|\theta ,x_0)=f(x-x_0\left|\theta \right),x\in [a+x_0,b+x_0]$ it can be proved that $g$ is a p.d.f. by verifying if it respects the two conditions^[5] $g\left(x\right|\theta ,x_0)\ge 0$ and ${\int }_{-\infty }^{\infty }g\left(x\right|\theta ,x_0)dx=1$. $g$ integrates to 1 because: ${\int }_{-\infty }^{\infty }g\left(x\right|\theta ,x_0)dx={\int }_{a+x_0}^{b+x_0}g(x|\theta ,x_0)dx={\int }_{a+x_0}^{b+x_0}f(x-x_0|\theta )dx$ now making the variable change $u=x-x_0$ and updating the integration interval accordingly yields: ${\int }_a^{b}f\left(u\right|\theta )du=1$ because $f\left(x\right|\theta )$ is a p.d.f. by hypothesis. $g\left(x\right|\theta ,x_0)\ge 0$ follows from $g$ sharing the same image of $f$, which is a p.d.f. so its range is contained in $[0,1]$.

• Central tendency
• Location test
• Invariant estimator
• Scale parameter
• Two-moment decision models

• "1.3.6.4. Location and Scale Parameters". National Institute of Standards and Technology. Retrieved 2025-03-17.