GeezerVison

You can help expand this article with text translated from the corresponding article in French. (July 2025) Click [show] for important translation instructions. View a machine-translated version of the French article. Machine translation, like DeepL or Google Translate, is a useful starting point for translations, but translators must follow the LLM translation guideline, revise errors as necessary and confirm that the translation is accurate, rather than simply copy-pasting machine-translated text into the English Wikipedia. Consider adding a topic to this template: there are already 1,425 articles in the main category, and specifying|topic= will aid in categorization. Do not translate text that appears unreliable or low-quality. If possible, verify the text with references provided in the foreign-language article. You must provide copyright attribution in the edit summary accompanying your translation by providing an interlanguage link to the source of your translation. A model attribution edit summary is Content in this edit is translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:UFC - Que Choisir]]; see its history for attribution. You may also add the template {{Translated|fr|UFC - Que Choisir}} to the talk page. For more guidance, see Wikipedia:Translation.

UFC-Que Choisir

Formation	1951
Purpose	Consumer movement
Headquarters	233, Boulevard Voltaire, Paris 11e[1]
Region served	France
Official language	French
Key people	Alain Bazot (president)
Website	quechoisir.org

UFC-Que Choisir is a French consumers group with 160 domestic local groups.^[2]

UFC-Que Choisir defends the rights of consumers in litigation against corporations, and pushes for public policies reinforcing the rights of consumers.

It publishes a magazine called Que Choisir ("What to Choose").

It filed a lawsuit in France's Tribunal de Grande Instance against Facebook, Google, and Twitter for "abusive" and "illegal" practices regarding data privacy and their failure to modify their privacy policies and terms of service despite repeated warnings and months of negotiations. They faulted the terms of services for being "incomprehensible, illegible, filled with hyperlinks...and sometimes referring to pages in English". Their statement accused the companies of shirking responsibility: "If the social media networks are particularly greedy in terms of data, they are dieting when it comes to responsibility".^[3]