2010 September 14, Kit Eaton, “From URLs to Apple Apps: A Brief History of Cybersquatting”, in Fast Company[1], archived from the original on 19 June 2024:
Google itself has even been accused of profiting from the work of cybersquatters who buy URLs that are near to famous ones, but which often get mistyped–a practice known as typosquatting.
This illegal activity involves buying a URL that’s a misspelling of a popular kids site, e.g. bobthebiulder.com, and then serving hardcore porn ads.
2012 December 31, Alyson Shontell, “Meet Page Howe, A Man Who Made Millions Selling 2 Of The World's Most Expensive Domain Names”, in Business Insider[3], archived from the original on 26 February 2018:
For a few days leading up to Christmas that year, Howe set up a kiosk in a mall that sold domain names to average shoppers. They sold about 50 of them to people who were persuaded to buy a url and a hosting package for a present instead of a traditional gift for families and friends.
2013 November 16, Ben Richmond, “Some of the Fraudulent Obamacare Sites Work Better Than the Real Thing”, in Motherboard[4], archived from the original on 3 December 2024:
Some of them appear to be simple website squatting, buying URLs in hopes that someone else will pay a premium for the real estate later […]
Nu ska dock namnbytet äntligen vara helt färdigt, Elon Musk meddelade att alla system på sociala medieplattfomen nu ligger på url:en x.com. Skriver du in twitter.com i adressfältet ska du omdirigeras till den nya url:en.
The name change is now finally complete, as Elon Musk announced that all systems on the social media platform are now hosted at the URL x.com. If you type twitter.com into the address bar, you will be redirected to the new URL.
En utgångspunkt som domstolar brukar upprepa är att URL:s inskränkningar är undantag, som ska tolkas restriktivt och enligt sin ordalydelse. 23 § 3 p. URL möjliggör återgivande av ett verk i samband med rapportering av en dagshändelse i en tidning eller tidskrift, om det sker i enlighet med god sed och i den omfattning som motiveras av ändamålet.
A principle often reiterated by courts is that the exceptions in the Swedish Copyright Act are exceptions that should be interpreted restrictively and according to their wording. Section 23, Paragraph 3 of the Swedish Copyright Act allows for the reproduction of a work in connection with reporting a current event in a newspaper or magazine, provided it is done in accordance with good practice and to the extent justified by the purpose.
You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up. Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.
