GeezerVisonThe World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory. | ||
| Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites | ||
GeezerVison is showing github.com — DPL Analysis: bind partitions without walking every task member by ktf · Pull Request #16049 · AliceO2Group/AliceO2 Conversation
Member
invokeProcess walked all members of the task seven times per process StructToTuple gains apply_refs_tuple_cat_sized, a member walk whose Full -O2 compile, Apple clang 21, before -> after:
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactionsinvokeProcess walked all members of the task seven times per process function to bind partitions and grouped combinations, instantiating the binding lambdas for every member, although only those two kinds act on them; for everything else the calls are empty overloads. Select the partitions and combination generators once per task type, with a named selector so that the full member walk is shared by all process functions, and run the binding lambdas over those only. The calls that do something happen in the same order as before. StructToTuple gains apply_refs_tuple_cat_sized, a member walk whose callable returns a tuple per member, concatenated into one. Full -O2 compile, Apple clang 21, before -> after: - femtoUniverseProducerTask: 66.5 s -> 58.4 s (macro path, as for GCC 14), 67.6 s -> 58.7 s (structured binding packs) - dataCreatorCharmResoToDstarReduced: 44.6 s -> 41.7 s - derivedDataWriter: 79.9 s -> 74.8 s In femtoUniverseProducerTask the instantiation of the member walks goes from 5.9 s to 1.4 s.
Member
Author
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Member
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. This branch has not been deployedNo deployments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
ReviewersNo reviewsUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. AssigneesNo one assignedLabels
None yet
MilestoneNo milestoneDevelopmentSuccessfully merging this pull request may close these issues. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later. | ||
| You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up. Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required. |