GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — [Implement] Buffer.compare by jtenner · Pull Request #7 · AssemblyScript/node

Conversation

@jtenner

@jtenner jtenner commented Jul 19, 2019 •
edited
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Notes:

  • this function works really nicely with memory.compare()
  • Currently, the compiler doesn't like using static functions as function parameters (Will open an issue in the AssemblyScript repo)
ERROR AS218: Cannot access method 'compare' without calling it as it requires 'this' to be set.

     actual.sort(Buffer.compare);
                 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 in tests/buffer.spec.ts(60,16)

Edit:

  • Switching to static readonly function expression causes this to compile

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
@jtenner
jtenner requested a review from dcodeIO July 19, 2019 19:53
@jtenner jtenner self-assigned this Jul 19, 2019
@jtenner jtenner added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 19, 2019
@jtenner
jtenner force-pushed the compare branch from d9abae1 to a601a60 Compare July 19, 2019 20:07
@jtenner jtenner mentioned this pull request Jul 19, 2019
[Bug] Static class method cannot be used as callback AssemblyScript/assemblyscript#720
Closed
@jtenner
[Implement] Buffer.compare
09af2a2
@jtenner
jtenner force-pushed the compare branch from a601a60 to 09af2a2 Compare July 19, 2019 20:29
@jtenner
[Chore] Merge master,
15cbf06
@jtenner

jtenner commented Jul 23, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

With the static function fix, everything seems to look nice. Thoughts? @dcodeIO

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@jtenner

jtenner commented Aug 1, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

TODO: Implement Buffer#compare.
TODO: Return 1, 0, or -1

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@dcodeIO dcodeIO Awaiting requested review from dcodeIO

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

@jtenner jtenner

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

1 participant

@jtenner
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.