GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — Make limited search and call graph previews stable after reindexing by harshitdeora · Pull Request #1892 · CodeGraphContext/CodeGraphContext

Conversation

@harshitdeora

@harshitdeora harshitdeora commented Nov 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Refs #1865.

When more nodes or edges match than a preview can display, the database's storage order decides which rows are shown. Rebuilding the same graph in a different file order can therefore change the search, call graph, or override preview even though the code is identical.

Sort those rows by source identity before applying their existing limits. For call edges, also use the destination and call-site metadata. Typed searches retain a label-specific match and use properties available on that label in the embedded schema.

The regression builds the same 200-file graph in opposite insertion orders. All six cases (name, pattern, type, incoming calls, outgoing calls, and overrides) fail on the base and pass with the fix. The focused Kuzu run passed 38 tests, and all six regressions passed on Ladybug. Ruff, Black on the new tests, and git diff --check passed. This covers the six preview branches above. Call-chain, dependencies, inheritance, the offline default and other query paths listed in #1865 are outside this change. Neo4j and FalkorDB were outside local validation.

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
@harshitdeora
fix(viz): stabilize limited search and call previews
441e915
@github-project-automation github-project-automation Bot added this to CGC Progress Board Nov 6, 2026
@github-project-automation github-project-automation Bot moved this to Backlog tasks in CGC Progress Board Nov 6, 2026
@vercel

vercel Bot commented Nov 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@harshitdeora is attempting to deploy a commit to the shashankss1205's projects Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

CGC Progress Board
Status: Backlog tasks

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

1 participant

@harshitdeora
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.