GeezerVisonThe World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory. |
| Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites |
GeezerVison is showing github.com — Split large write buffers into chunks libuv accepts by jensbjorgensen · Pull Request #793 · MagicStack/uvloop Conversation
Contributor
Summarylibuv 1.52.0 added
We hit this in production on a server that streams a large snapshot to a Fix
Reproducerimport asyncio import uvloop async def main(): async def handler(reader, writer): while await reader.read(1 << 20): pass server = await asyncio.start_server(handler, '127.0.0.1', 0) reader, writer = await asyncio.open_connection( *server.sockets[0].getsockname()) writer.writelines([b'x'] * (1024 * 1024 + 1)) await writer.drain() print('ok') uvloop.run(main()) On uvloop 0.23.0 the transport is closed with OSError(22, 'Invalid argument') and drain() raises ConnectionResetError: Connection lost. With this change it prints ok. Same result with PYTHONASYNCIODEBUG=1. Changes - uvloop/handles/stream.pyx, stream.pxd: add __MAX_WRITE_BUFS and UVStream._exec_write_chunks(), called from _exec_write() when len(self._buffer) exceeds the limit. - tests/test_tcp.py: test_many_queued_writes covers both the empty-queue path (writelines() of 1M+1 buffers on a fresh connection) and the queued path (1M+1 write() calls while libuv has data pending). It fails on master and passes with this change, on normal and UVLOOP_DEBUG builds. Tested on Linux with 3.14 against libuv 1.53.0.
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactionslibuv >= 1.52 rejects uv_write()/uv_try_write() requests carrying more than 1024*1024 buffers with UV_EINVAL. A transport that keeps receiving write() calls while libuv still has pending data accumulates every buffer in UVStream._buffer and flushed them in a single request, so a burst of more than 1M small writes in one loop iteration killed the connection with OSError(22, 'Invalid argument'). Hand the buffered writes to libuv in chunks of at most 1024*1024 buffers, one uv_write() request each.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
ReviewersNo reviewsUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. AssigneesNo one assignedLabels
None yet
ProjectsMilestoneNo milestoneDevelopmentSuccessfully merging this pull request may close these issues. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later. |
| You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up. Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required. |