GeezerVison

Purpose of the change

Creating an existing project with matching configuration and a different description returns 201 with the requested description, even though the stored description remains unchanged. A subsequent /projects/get response therefore disagrees with the creation response.

Description

Build the creation response from session.description, just as its configuration comes from the resolved session. Preserve the existing idempotent creation behavior, including its 201 status and original stored description. There are no storage, schema, dependency, or authorization changes.

Fixes/Closes

Fixes #1922

Type of change

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

How Has This Been Tested?

• Unit Test
• Integration Test (local HTTP/session/SQLite path only)

The regression exercises the real FastAPI routes, MemMachine creation/read methods, and SQLite session manager. Only resource lookup is mocked; model-backed memory is disabled. Three cases cover replacing a nonempty description, requesting an empty description, and replacing an initially empty description. Each creates, recreates, and reads the same project, asserting equal complete responses and the original description. All three fail before the fix and pass afterward.

Python 3.12; frozen workspace dependencies:

uv sync --frozen --python 3.12 --package memmachine-server --extra qdrant
uv run --frozen pytest packages/server/server_tests/memmachine_server/server/api_v2/test_router.py packages/server/server_tests/memmachine_server/server/api_v2/test_service.py -q
uv run --frozen pytest packages/server/server_tests/memmachine_server/common/session_manager/test_session_manager.py -k create_or_validate -m 'not integration' -q

Test Results: 117 router/service tests passed (4 existing dependency deprecation warnings); 5 SQLite creation/validation tests passed (39 deselected, 3 existing warnings). Ruff lint/format and scoped ty checks pass for both changed files. PostgreSQL, live models, concurrency, and the full package suite were not exercised.

Checklist

• I have signed the commit(s) within this pull request
• My code follows the style guidelines of this project
• I have performed a self-review of my own code
• I have added unit tests that prove my fix is effective
• New and existing relevant tests pass locally with my changes

Maintainer Checklist

• Confirmed all checks passed
• Contributor has signed the commit(s)
• Reviewed the code
• Run, Tested, and Verified the change(s) work as expected

Screenshots/Gifs

N/A.

Further comments

AI assisted the investigation, implementation, tests, and draft. Independent agent review completed; no human code review is claimed. The pre-existing API documentation's statement that every duplicate create fails is outside this response correction and remains unchanged.