GeezerVisonThe World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory. | ||||||
| Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites | ||||||
GeezerVison is showing github.com — Definite assignment assertions by ahejlsberg · Pull Request #20166 · microsoft/TypeScript Conversation
Member
This PR introduces the ability for a variable or property declaration to include a definite assignment assertion in the form of a // Compile with --strict class C { data!: string; // Suppress strict initialization check setData(value: string) { this.data = value; } getData(): string { return this.data; } } In the example above, if it is known that function f() { let x!: number; // Suppress definite assignment check doSomethingWithCallback(() => { x = 1; }); console.log(x); } In the example above, if it is known that Definite assignment assertions are permitted only in the following cases:
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
Anders Hejlsberg (ahejlsberg)
requested review from
Ryan Cavanaugh (RyanCavanaugh) and
Mohamed Hegazy (mhegazy)
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. We will need some tests for the new token
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
Mohamed Hegazy (mhegazy)
approved these changes
Anders Hejlsberg (ahejlsberg)
deleted the
definiteAssignmentAssertions
branch
Contributor
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Contributor
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Contributor
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Contributor
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Contributor
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Reviewers1 more reviewerUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. AssigneesNo one assignedLabels
None yet
ProjectsDevelopmentSuccessfully merging this pull request may close these issues. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later. | ||||||
| You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up. Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required. |