GeezerVisonThe World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GeezerVison is showing github.com — feat: add PhoneService, PhoneAPIKeyService, and WebhookService by AchoArnold · Pull Request #5 · NdoleStudio/httpsms-go Conversation
Member
Adds three new services to the SDK for managing phones, phone API keys, and webhooks programmatically. New Services
Changes
These are needed by the httpSMS integration test suite to dynamically create phones and webhooks per test.
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions- PhoneService: Upsert() and UpsertFCMToken() for phone management - PhoneAPIKeyService: Store() for creating phone API keys - WebhookService: Store() for creating webhooks with signing keys - Register new services on Client struct Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]> Add success, error, and request verification tests for all new service methods introduced in this branch: - PhoneService.Upsert and PhoneService.UpsertFCMToken - PhoneAPIKeyService.Store - WebhookService.Store Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]> Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Pull request overviewThis PR expands the Go SDK with new write-side services for provisioning phones, phone API keys, and webhooks, which fits the SDK’s role as a thin client over the httpSMS API and supports the integration tests’ need to create these resources programmatically. Changes:
Reviewed changesCopilot reviewed 14 out of 15 changed files in this pull request and generated 4 comments. Show a summary per file
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
Comment on lines
+14
to
+19
Comment on lines
+20
to
+22
Comment on lines
+28
to
+30
Member
Author
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Reviewers
Copilot code review
Copilot
Copilot review effort
Applies to this pull request for everyone.Learn more about Copilot code review.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. AssigneesNo one assignedLabels
None yet
ProjectsMilestoneNo milestoneDevelopmentSuccessfully merging this pull request may close these issues. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| You are visitor 01402520 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up. Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required. |