GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — [Snyk] Security upgrade com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind from 2.14.2 to 2.18.12 by caniszczyk · Pull Request #72 · OpenFunction/functions-framework-java

Conversation

@caniszczyk

@caniszczyk caniszczyk commented Oct 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the maven dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • functions-framework-invoker/pom.xml

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score Upgrade
critical severity Deserialization of Untrusted Data
SNYK-JAVA-COMFASTERXMLJACKSONCORE-21761837
  858   com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind:
2.14.2 -> 2.18.12
Proof of Concept

Breaking Change Risk

Merge Risk: Medium

Notice: This assessment is enhanced by AI.


Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Deserialization of Untrusted Data

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
@snyk-bot
fix: functions-framework-invoker/pom.xml to reduce vulnerabilities
3faf5c0
The following vulnerabilities are fixed with an upgrade:
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JAVA-COMFASTERXMLJACKSONCORE-21761837
@caniszczyk

caniszczyk commented Oct 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Merge Risk: Medium

This upgrade from version 2.14.2 to 2.18.12 spans multiple minor releases and introduces significant behavioral changes, primarily for security and robustness. While no major API removals are noted, the changes require verification.

Key Breaking Changes:

  • Processing Limits (DoS Protection) in 2.15+: To prevent Denial of Service attacks from malicious payloads, Jackson now enforces default limits on incoming JSON. Exceeding these limits will throw a StreamConstraintsException.
    • Max Nesting Depth: Default is 1000 levels.
    • Max Number Length: Default is 1000 characters.
    • Max String Length: Default is 5,000,000 characters.
  • Stricter Number Parsing in 2.17+: Strings with leading zeros (e.g., "07") are no longer automatically coerced into numbers for constructs like Enum indexes.
  • Security Default Change in 2.16+: The default for StreamReadFeature.INCLUDE_SOURCE_IN_LOCATION has been changed to false to avoid leaking source information in error messages.
  • Avro Module Dependency in 2.18+: If you use the jackson-dataformat-avro module, its core dependency was upgraded to Avro 1.11.3. Schemas generated with this version may not be readable by older clients.

Recommendation:
Verify if your application processes very large or deeply nested JSON documents. If so, you may need to create a custom JsonFactory with adjusted StreamReadConstraints to avoid runtime exceptions. Review code that relies on string-to-number coercion, especially for enums.

Notice 🤖: This content was augmented using artificial intelligence. AI-generated content may contain errors and should be reviewed for accuracy before use.

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@CLAassistant

CLAassistant commented Oct 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

3 participants

@caniszczyk @CLAassistant @snyk-bot
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.