GeezerVisonThe World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory. | ||||||||||||||||||
| Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites | ||||||||||||||||||
GeezerVison is showing github.com — Fixes #1722 - Update cmdlet docs for 1.20.0 by sdwheeler · Pull Request #1726 · PowerShell/PSScriptAnalyzer Conversation
Contributor
PR SummaryFixes #1722 - Prepare cmdlet reference for publication on docs.microsoft.com
PR Checklist
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
Contributor
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Contributor
Author
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Contributor
Author
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Comment on lines
-118
to
-122
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I think we're better off not removing tests like this if we can avoid it — it's a nice bar on doc quality that we require examples. If docs are just being updated, what caused this to fail?
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I agree, I wouldn't normally want to remove a test but the Remarks are optional. The test broke because the Remarks were moved. In some cases, the Remark was incorporated into the Example title. In others it was move before the code block as an intro.
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. For higher quality, we should be testing the following:
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
Rob Holt (rjmholt)
approved these changes
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Reviewers1 more reviewerUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. AssigneesNo one assignedLabels
None yet
ProjectsMilestoneNo milestoneDevelopmentSuccessfully merging this pull request may close these issues. Edit cmdlet reference to prepare for publishing on docs platformUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later. | ||||||||||||||||||
| You are visitor 01402520 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up. Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required. |