GeezerVisonThe World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GeezerVison is showing github.com — Apply implicit-remoting command protections to resolved aliases by jshigetomi · Pull Request #28208 · PowerShell/PowerShell Conversation
Collaborator
PR SummaryThis pull request improves the handling of command aliases and skip-list checks during implicit remoting in PowerShell, ensuring that commands on the server's skip-list cannot be imported via aliases unless explicitly allowed. It also adds new tests to cover these scenarios. PR ContextPR Checklist
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. 🟡 Changes recommendedThe corrected resolved-name safety check needs a regression test for an alias targeting an unsafe command name. 1 open findingWhat changed in this PRThis PR applies implicit-remoting import safeguards to alias targets, preventing aliases from bypassing command restrictions. Changes:
🧠 Review effort: Balanced 💡 Add a
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Before the change IsSafeNameOrIdentifier was used only once and it threw if null or empty. Also here we don't check for empty but do the check below. Should we move both checks to IsSafeNameOrIdentifier?
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
12 tasks
Dongbo Wang (daxian-dbw)
approved these changes
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Reviewers
Copilot code review
Copilot
Copilot review effort
Applies to this pull request for everyone.Learn more about Copilot code review.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. AssigneesNo one assignedLabels
CL-General
ProjectsMilestoneNo milestoneDevelopmentSuccessfully merging this pull request may close these issues. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up. Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required. |