GeezerVisonThe World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GeezerVison is showing github.com — Restore canonical limited C API consumer tests by youknowdot · Pull Request #9501 · RustPython/RustPython Conversation
Contributor
SummaryRestore ten missing limited-C-API fixture consumer test modules from pinned CPython 3.15.0 ( All twelve files are byte-identical to the pin. No native implementation, fixture registration, global test-enablement flag, adapter, skip, or assertion is changed. Each test module already has CPython's early optional This is source restoration, not C API support or passing test-body coverage. Current RustPython has no Validation
ScopeNo direct changed-file overlap with #9143 or #9270; this does not implement their native fixtures, CI capability or Windows exports. This is a bounded source-restoration slice of the Python 3.15 upgrade tracked in #8954. No dependency on #9498 updater adaptations. AI disclosureOpenAI Codex assisted with source selection, safety/ownership review, the updater invocation, source-identity and tooling checks, and this description. The restored Python files themselves are unchanged upstream CPython source. No human runtime verification or successful C API body execution is claimed; this draft is explicitly limited to canonical source restoration.
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactionsRestore ten missing test modules and two package entry points with scripts/update_lib migrate from CPython d220409a13b77de7a6c30abe16ea90db01528edc. Preserve canonical optional-fixture import guards without changing assertions or enabling native fixtures. This is source restoration, not C API support; 32 package files remain missing. OpenAI Codex assisted source selection, source-only safety review, migration, and byte/AST/tooling validation. No local interpreter tests or native builds were run. Assisted-by: OpenAI Codex:model version unavailable
Contributor
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Contributor
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Contributor
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
youknowone
approved these changes
youknowone
marked this pull request as ready for review
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. 💡 Codex ReviewHere are some automated review suggestions for this pull request. Reviewed commit: ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The reviewed commit explicitly documents OpenAI Codex assistance, but its message contains no AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L23-L23 Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For this AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L35-L35 Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
ReviewersUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. AssigneesNo one assignedLabels
None yet
ProjectsMilestoneNo milestoneDevelopmentSuccessfully merging this pull request may close these issues. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up. Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||