GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — Verify and retry Wasmer installation before the WASI build by youknowdot · Pull Request #9755 · RustPython/RustPython

Conversation

@youknowdot

@youknowdot youknowdot commented Nov 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Replace the WASI job's installer with the official Wasmer 7.5.0 Linux x86_64 archive, pinned by SHA256.
  • Retry transient download failures, fail on HTTP errors or checksum mismatch, and run wasmer --version before exporting the runtime and starting the Rust build.
  • Keep this restricted to the existing ubuntu-latest WASI job, explicitly rejecting unexpected platforms. No new jobs or test suppression.

Why

The existing installer returned exit 0 after File download failed with code 500 in #9745's WASI job. Setup was marked successful, an expensive build ran, and the first snippet failed with wasmer: command not found (127). A previous run exhibited the same pattern with HTTP 504. The setup action retries downloading its installer, not the runtime download inside it.

The checksum matches the digest of the official v7.5.0 release. Using a fixed GitHub release avoids the mutable installer/download redirect while preserving retries for transient release-host failures.

Validation

  • Executed the exact workflow shell block locally against the official release: SHA256 OK, wasmer 7.5.0, environment/path export succeeded.
  • Fault injection: download error, checksum mismatch, and missing executable all fail before exporting PATH/environment (exit 22, 1, and 127 respectively).
  • actionlint passed; normal commit hooks passed; zizmor reports the same four existing low-severity self-repository findings, no new findings.
  • No interpreter changes; workspace/CAPI tests and full WASI build were not repeated locally for this workflow-only patch. CI is the remaining hosted-run validation.

Independent change based on current main, not stacked on the WASI coverage or pytest PRs. No Actions rerun was requested.

AI assistance: OpenAI Codex (model version unavailable).

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
@codex
Verify and retry Wasmer installation before the WASI build
805aef9
Pin the official Linux x86_64 release archive, verify its SHA256, and check the installed binary before exporting it. Avoid installer false-success on HTTP 5xx.

Assisted-by: OpenAI Codex:version-unavailable
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Nov 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Important

Draft PR not reviewed

Draft PRs are not automatically reviewed by default.

  • Trigger a manual review

To automatically review draft PRs, update your CodeRabbit configuration:

reviews:
  auto_review:
    drafts: true
  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

Share

  • X
  • Mastodon
  • Reddit
  • LinkedIn
All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

youknowone
youknowone requested changes Nov 9, 2026
View reviewed changes

@youknowone youknowone left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

tell me why this is worth to do

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@youknowone youknowone youknowone requested changes

Requested changes must be addressed to merge this pull request.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

3 participants

@youknowdot @youknowone @codex
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.