GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — chore(deps): Bump rustls-webpki from 0.103.9 to 0.103.13 by dependabot[bot] · Pull Request #66 · SocketDev/socket-patch

Conversation

@dependabot

@dependabot dependabot Bot commented on behalf of github Apr 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Bumps rustls-webpki from 0.103.9 to 0.103.13.

Release notes

Sourced from rustls-webpki's releases.

0.103.13

  • Fix reachable panic in parsing a CRL. This was reported to us as GHSA-82j2-j2ch-gfr8. Users who don't use CRLs are not affected.
  • For name constraints on URI names, we incorrectly processed excluded subtrees in a way which inverted the desired meaning. See rustls/webpki#471. This was a case missing in the fix for GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5.

What's Changed

  • Actually fail closed for URI matching against excluded subtrees by @​djc in rustls/webpki#473
  • Prepare 0.103.13 by @​ctz in rustls/webpki#474

Full Changelog: rustls/webpki@v/0.103.12...v/0.103.13

0.103.12

This release fixes two bugs in name constraint enforcement:

  • GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5: name constraints for URI names were ignored and therefore accepted. URI name constraints are now rejected unconditionally. Note this library does not provide an API for asserting URI names, and URI name constraints are otherwise not implemented.
  • GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh: permitted subtree name constraints for DNS names were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name. This was incorrect because, given a name constraint of accept.example.com, *.example.com could feasibly allow a name of reject.example.com which is outside the constraint. This is very similar to CVE-2025-61727.

Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, these bugs are reachable only after signature verification and require misissuance to exploit.

What's Changed

  • Prepare 0.103.12 by @​djc in rustls/webpki#470

Full Changelog: rustls/webpki@v/0.103.11...v/0.103.12

0.103.11

In response to #464, we've slightly relaxed requirements for anchor_from_trust_cert() to ignore unknown extensions even if they're marked as critical. This only affects parsing a TrustAnchor from DER, for which most extensions are ignored anyway.

What's Changed

  • Backport parsing trust anchors with unknown critical extensions to 0.103 by @​djc in rustls/webpki#466

0.103.10

Correct selection of candidate CRLs by Distribution Point and Issuing Distribution Point. If a certificate had more than one distributionPoint, then only the first distributionPoint would be considered against each CRL's IssuingDistributionPoint distributionPoint, and then the certificate's subsequent distributionPoints would be ignored.

The impact was that correctly provided CRLs would not be consulted to check revocation. With UnknownStatusPolicy::Deny (the default) this would lead to incorrect but safe Error::UnknownRevocationStatus. With UnknownStatusPolicy::Allow this would lead to inappropriate acceptance of revoked certificates.

This vulnerability is thought to be of limited impact. This is because both the certificate and CRL are signed -- an attacker would need to compromise a trusted issuing authority to trigger this bug. An attacker with such capabilities could likely bypass revocation checking through other more impactful means (such as publishing a valid, empty CRL.)

More likely, this bug would be latent in normal use, and an attacker could leverage faulty revocation checking to continue using a revoked credential.

This vulnerability is identified by GHSA-pwjx-qhcg-rvj4. Thank you to @​1seal for the report.

What's Changed

  • Freshen up rel-0.103 by @​ctz in rustls/webpki#455
  • Prepare 0.103.10 by @​ctz in rustls/webpki#458

Full Changelog: rustls/webpki@v/0.103.9...v/0.103.10

Commits
  • 2879b2c Prepare 0.103.13
  • 2c49773 Improve tests for padding of BitStringFlags
  • 4e3c0b3 Correct validation of BIT STRING constraints
  • 39c91d2 Actually fail closed for URI matching against excluded subtrees
  • 27131d4 Bump version to 0.103.12
  • 6ecb876 Clean up stuttery enum variant names
  • 318b3e6 Ignore wildcard labels when matching name constraints
  • 1219622 Rewrite constraint matching to avoid permissive catch-all branch
  • 57bc62c Bump version to 0.103.11
  • d0fa01e Allow parsing trust anchors with unknown criticial extensions
  • Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
    You can disable automated security fix PRs for this repo from the Security Alerts page.

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
@dependabot
chore(deps): Bump rustls-webpki from 0.103.9 to 0.103.13
3ae6070
Bumps [rustls-webpki](https://github.com/rustls/webpki) from 0.103.9 to 0.103.13.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/releases)
- [Commits](rustls/webpki@v/0.103.9...v/0.103.13)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: rustls-webpki
  dependency-version: 0.103.13
  dependency-type: indirect
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
@dependabot dependabot Bot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file rust Pull requests that update rust code labels Apr 24, 2026
@dependabot dependabot Bot mentioned this pull request Apr 24, 2026
Bump rustls-webpki from 0.103.9 to 0.103.10 #42
Closed
@mikolalysenko
Mikola Lysenko (mikolalysenko) enabled auto-merge (squash) May 12, 2026 18:59
mikolalysenko
Mikola Lysenko (mikolalysenko) approved these changes May 12, 2026
View reviewed changes
@mikolalysenko
Mikola Lysenko (mikolalysenko) merged commit 5550100 into main May 12, 2026
19 checks passed

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@mikolalysenko
Mikola Lysenko (mikolalysenko) deleted the dependabot/cargo/rustls-webpki-0.103.13 branch May 12, 2026 18:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@mikolalysenko Mikola Lysenko (mikolalysenko) mikolalysenko approved these changes

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file rust Pull requests that update rust code

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

1 participant

@mikolalysenko
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402520 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.