GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — ci: improve Ruff workflow configuration by Purvi1558 · Pull Request #15716 · TheAlgorithms/Python

Conversation

@Purvi1558

@Purvi1558 Purvi1558 commented Nov 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Describe your change

Improved the Ruff GitHub Actions workflow by:

  • Adding a descriptive job name.
  • Adding concurrency controls to cancel outdated workflow runs.
  • Restricting workflow permissions to contents: read.

Checklist

  • I have read CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • This pull request is all my own work -- I have not plagiarized.
  • I know that pull requests will not be merged if they fail the automated tests.
  • This PR only changes one algorithm file. To ease review, please open separate PRs for separate algorithms.
  • All new Python files are placed inside an existing directory.
  • All filenames are in all lowercase characters with no spaces or dashes.
  • All functions and variable names follow Python naming conventions.
  • All function parameters and return values are annotated with Python type hints.
  • All functions have doctests that pass the automated testing.
  • All new algorithms include at least one URL that points to Wikipedia or another similar explanation.
  • If this pull request resolves one or more open issues, then the description above includes the issue number(s) with a closing keyword: Fixes Optimize the linting's rules with RUff and Zizmor #15696.

Fixes #15696

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
@Purvi1558
ci: improve Ruff workflow configuration
185c8c9
@Purvi1558
Purvi1558 requested a review from cclauss as a code owner November 12, 2026 01:39
@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper Bot added awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed enhancement This PR modified some existing files labels Nov 12, 2026

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@cclauss cclauss Awaiting requested review from cclauss cclauss is a code owner

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed enhancement This PR modified some existing files

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Optimize the linting's rules with RUff and Zizmor

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

1 participant

@Purvi1558
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.