GeezerVison

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.11%. Comparing base (542f7d6) to head (01ed5ba).
Report is 6 commits behind head on master.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #8649   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.11%   99.11%           
=======================================
  Files         141      141           
  Lines        4073     4073           
=======================================
  Hits         4037     4037           
  Misses         36       36           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@mgrunberg Would the configuration be simplified if the view files were published in the NPM package, similar to what #8220 was trying to achieve? I think that would remove the need for the #ACTIVE_ADMIN_GEM# placeholder in the config and allow for referencing the plugin and view files using a relative path.

@mgrunberg Would the configuration be simplified if the view files were published in the NPM package, similar to what #8220 was trying to achieve? I think that would remove the need for the #ACTIVE_ADMIN_GEM# placeholder in the config and allow for referencing the plugin and view files using a relative path.

@hasghari Thanks for the contribution, but I'm not ready to reopen the #8220 discussion. That's why I'm still referencing gem files.

Speaking about simplicity, I do have the idea of reducing the usage of #ACTIVE_ADMIN_GEM, but I'm not finding time to come back to the PR.

Hey!

I've successfully moved to tailwind v4 by having both javascript and css configurations within the same setup. Full configuration is here: https://gist.github.com/amkisko/af1b2f7dc4f0f941437ea16400277864

The idea is to use "old" way with custom rake task and javascript configuration file for resolving dynamic paths in pair with @config "../../../config/tailwind-active_admin.config.js"; tailwind v4 config method. ActiveAdmin tailwind plugin does not work, so it requires rewriting to the new v4 syntax fully.