GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — Allure-pytest and allure-pytest-bdd compatibility · Issue #109 · allure-framework/allure-python

Allure-pytest and allure-pytest-bdd compatibility #109

New issue
Copy link
New issue
Copy link
Closed as duplicate
Closed as duplicate
Allure-pytest and allure-pytest-bdd compatibility#109
Copy link
Labels
task:improvementChange that improves some user experience but can't be considered a new featureChange that improves some user experience but can't be considered a new featuretheme:pytesttheme:pytest-bdd

Description

@sseliverstov
sseliverstov
opened on Jul 18, 2017
Issue body actions

I'm submitting a ...

  • bug report
  • feature request
  • support request => Please do not submit support request here, see note at the top of this template.

allure-framework/allure-pytest#79

Reacted by Juliano Graciano, Iramis Valentin, Vladislav Mukhamatnurov, delrey1, Ljancek, Ilya Ashikhmin and JasonF-BJSS

Activity

  1. sseliverstov
    added
    theme:pytest
    on Jul 22, 2017

  2. iramisvalentincapco commented on Feb 6, 2019

    @iramisvalentincapco
    iramisvalentincapco
    on Feb 6, 2019
    More actions

    Is there any update on this? Is this already supported? Does pytest-bdd or allure even need to explicitly "support" each other or do they both adhere to the same reporting formats + standards? I'm also unclear on what the original feature request is actually asking for.

    Would love an update from the devs/maintainers on this!

  3. nazarlviv07 commented on Mar 6, 2019

    @nazarlviv07
    nazarlviv07
    on Mar 6, 2019
    More actions

    Do you have any update on this feature ?

  4. aimeejtix commented on Oct 25, 2019

    @aimeejtix
    aimeejtix
    on Oct 25, 2019
    More actions

    This support would be great to have! Seems like a lot of people are looking for it.. including myself!
    Is there still work being done on this?

  5. sseliverstov
    added
    theme:pytest-bdd
    on Nov 27, 2020
  6. delatrie
    self-assigned this
    on Jan 25, 2023
  7. delatrie
    changed the title [-]Compatible with pytest-bdd[/-] [+]Allure-pytest and allure-pytest-bdd compatibility[/+] on Feb 1, 2023
  8. delatrie
    removed their assignment
    on Apr 22, 2023
  9. delatrie
    added
    task:improvementChange that improves some user experience but can't be considered a new featureChange that improves some user experience but can't be considered a new feature
    on Jul 9, 2023

  10. clergyman commented on Aug 7, 2025

    @clergyman
    clergyman
    on Aug 7, 2025
    More actions

    Newer duplicate with a workaround in the comments

    When running unit tests, I run:
    pytest -p no:allure_pytest_bdd -m "not e2e"

    When running e2e tests, I run:
    pytest -p no:allure_pytest -m "e2e"

  11. clergyman
    closed this as a duplicateof allure-pytest-bdd encounters ValueError: option names {'--alluredir'} already added #486 on Aug 7, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    task:improvementChange that improves some user experience but can't be considered a new featureChange that improves some user experience but can't be considered a new featuretheme:pytesttheme:pytest-bdd

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions
      You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
      Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.