GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — Issues · cel-expr/cel-cpp


Change the issues type filter

Issues

New issue
  • This repository is moving to github.com/cel-expr/cel-cpp
    #2029 · dmitriplotnikov opened on May 26, 2026
Search issues
is:issue state:open
is:issue state:open
Clear filter
Search

    Issues

    • Open
      36 (36)
    • Closed
    • Comfortable display density
    • Compact display density
    • Support a completely ANTLR/Java-free C++ build using the native Pratt parser

      cel-expr/cel-cpp#2332 · opened on Oct 7, 2026
      1
    • Simple question on build

      cel-expr/cel-cpp#2290 · opened on Sep 24, 2026
    • This repository is moving to github.com/cel-expr/cel-cpp

      cel-expr/cel-cpp#2029 · opened on May 26, 2026
    • Add ports to vcpkg

      cel-expr/cel-cpp#1886 · opened on Feb 22, 2026
      1
    • Compiling to a fat library

      cel-expr/cel-cpp#1635 · opened on Jul 30, 2025
      1
    • FunctionRegistry cannot distinguish overloads differing only by container parameter types (e.g., list<int> vs list<string>)

      cel-expr/cel-cpp#1484 · opened on May 6, 2025
    • Building for consumption in other build systems

      cel-expr/cel-cpp#1215 · opened on Jan 29, 2025
      5
    • Using parser creates a dependency on java runtime for the client

      cel-expr/cel-cpp#740 · opened on May 20, 2024
    • Is there any example about how to add user-defined macros or functions in cel-cpp

      cel-expr/cel-cpp#213 · opened on Jun 6, 2023
      1
    • Missing definitions from 0.9.0

      cel-expr/cel-cpp#205 · opened on Jun 2, 2023
      1
    • AST renumbering doesn't renumber macro calls

      cel-expr/cel-cpp#139 · opened on Feb 7, 2022
    • Consistent typenames between runtime, debugging, and spec

      cel-expr/cel-cpp#136 · opened on Nov 30, 2021
    • Failure in conversions/int/double_to_int_min

      cel-expr/cel-cpp#129 · opened on Oct 2, 2021
    • Resolve +-0 in protobuf tests since libraries are inconsistent

      cel-expr/cel-cpp#128 · opened on Oct 2, 2021
      2
    • Ensure CelMap operator[] is const correct

      cel-expr/cel-cpp#122 · opened on Jun 10, 2021
    • Strong typing for enums

      cel-expr/cel-cpp#119 · opened on Mar 31, 2021
    • Integer overflow on enum assignments should error

      cel-expr/cel-cpp#117 · opened on Mar 31, 2021
    • Ensure the 'in' operator is a logical OR of element equality results

      cel-expr/cel-cpp#114 · opened on Mar 31, 2021
    • HTML docs for C++ implementation

      cel-expr/cel-cpp#107 · opened on Mar 19, 2021
      4
    • Refactor reference resolution into common utilities

      cel-expr/cel-cpp#105 · opened on Jan 28, 2021
    • Strip dyn() function references at type-check time

      cel-expr/cel-cpp#102 · opened on Dec 17, 2020
    • add optional reference check step in evaluation

      cel-expr/cel-cpp#99 · opened on Nov 24, 2020
    • Parse-only evaluation of namespaced identifiers fails

      cel-expr/cel-cpp#97 · opened on Nov 24, 2020
    • refactor AST traversal and rewrites to be more uniform

      cel-expr/cel-cpp#95 · opened on Nov 5, 2020
    • improve function resolution when type map is available

      cel-expr/cel-cpp#91 · opened on Nov 5, 2020
    You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
    Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.