GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — Support provider-specific AI model prices by SasSwart · Pull Request #30396 · coder/coder

Conversation

@SasSwart

@SasSwart SasSwart commented Oct 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Add a nullable provider-ID key to AI model prices with updated uniqueness, update SQLC queries to prefer provider-specific custom prices before falling back to provider-type custom/default prices, pass the resolved provider ID through cost calculation, regenerate query code, and add focused database and aibridge tests for per-provider pricing, fallback, zero-price, missing-price, and deleted-provider behavior.

Fixes AIGOV-612

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
All reactions
SasSwart added 3 commits October 5, 2026 08:12
@SasSwart
Support provider-specific AI model prices
9ba1c29
@SasSwart
Address problems in: Support provider-specific AI model prices
42bddfd
@SasSwart
Address problems in: Support provider-specific AI model prices
609f8d5
@linear-code

linear-code Bot commented Oct 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

AIGOV-612
All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
@github-actions github-actions Bot assigned SasSwart Oct 6, 2026
@SasSwart SasSwart closed this Oct 13, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 13, 2026
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Reviewers

@ibetitsmike ibetitsmike Awaiting requested review from ibetitsmike ibetitsmike will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review ibetitsmike is a code owner
@johnstcn johnstcn Awaiting requested review from johnstcn johnstcn will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review johnstcn is a code owner
@ssncferreira ssncferreira Awaiting requested review from ssncferreira ssncferreira will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review ssncferreira is a code owner

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

@SasSwart SasSwart

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

1 participant

@SasSwart
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.