GeezerVisonThe World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory. |
| Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites |
GeezerVison is showing github.com — [coverage] Conformance findings: CLOUDFETCH-019 · Issue #903 · databricks/databricks-sql-python Open DescriptionSummarySurfaced by the multi-language coverage fan-out while conformance-testing these SPEC-IDs against databricks/databricks-sql-python. Each finding is committed as an expected-failure (xfail) test in the coverage PR — the test asserts the CORRECT (post-fix) behavior and stays red until THIS driver (databricks/databricks-sql-python) is fixed, then flips green as a tripwire. Findings
Reproduce & ExpectedCLOUDFETCH-019 — A bad value for a client-side CloudFetch tuning knob must degrade to the driver default, never fail the connection.Reproduce:
Expected (per the shared spec):
result: - label: not_a_positive_integer no_exception: true - label: not_a_positive_integer row_count_min: 1 - label: above_maximum no_exception: true - label: above_maximum row_count_min: 1 protocol: thrift: - label: not_a_positive_integer request_field: method: OpenSession path: configuration.cloudfetch_max_chunks_in_memory present: false - label: not_a_positive_integer cloud_downloads_min: 1 sea: - label: not_a_positive_integer request_field: operation: CreateSession path: session_confs.cloudfetch_max_chunks_in_memory present: false - label: not_a_positive_integer cloud_downloads_min: 1 Context
ActivityMetadataMetadataAssigneesLabelsNo labels TypeProjectsMilestoneRelationshipsDevelopmentIssue actions |
| You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up. Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required. |