GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — [coverage] Conformance findings: STATEMENT-025 · Issue #944 · databricks/databricks-sql-python

[coverage] Conformance findings: STATEMENT-025 #944

New issue
Copy link
New issue
Copy link
Open
Open
[coverage] Conformance findings: STATEMENT-025#944
Copy link

Description

@peco-engineer-bot
peco-engineer-bot
bot
opened on Sep 5, 2026
Issue body actions

Summary

Surfaced by the multi-language coverage fan-out while conformance-testing these SPEC-IDs against databricks/databricks-sql-python. Each finding is committed as an expected-failure (xfail) test in the coverage PR — the test asserts the CORRECT (post-fix) behavior and stays red until THIS driver (databricks/databricks-sql-python) is fixed, then flips green as a tripwire.

Findings

  • STATEMENT-025 [thrift]: Cancel during result FETCH unwinds the fetching thread with wrong-state RESOURCE_DOES_NOT_EXIST ('Command does not exist') instead of a cancellation error
    • failing test: test_cancel_during_result_fetch_is_prompt_and_signal_only (see the coverage PR diff under tests/)
  • STATEMENT-025 [sea]: Cancel issued during a result FETCH is silently dropped on the Rust-kernel SEA path, so the in-flight fetch never unwinds and drains to natural completion
    • failing test: test_cancel_during_result_fetch_is_prompt_and_signal_only (see the coverage PR diff under tests/)
  • STATEMENT-025: Cursor.cancel() issued during a result FETCH is not honoured on either backend: thrift's interrupted fetch unwinds with wrong-state RESOURCE_DOES_NOT_EXIST instead of a cancellation error, and the Rust-kernel SEA path drops the cancel entirely so the fetch drains to natural completion; after a sync execute() returns, no cancellable in-flight operation is registered for the fetch phase

Reproduce & Expected

STATEMENT-025 — Validates cancellation while a result set is being FETCHED (not merely while the statement is EXECUTING -- that is STATEMENT-015/022).

Reproduce:

SELECT * FROM main.tpcds_sf1_delta.catalog_returns
SELECT 1
SELECT * FROM main.tpcds_sf1_delta.catalog_returns

Expected (per the shared spec):

  • completes without an exception
  • completes without an exception
  • completes without an exception
  • result has exactly 1 row(s)
  • completes without an exception
  • full assertion contract:
result:
- label: idle_cancel
  no_exception: true
- label: mid_fetch_cancel
  no_exception: true
- label: mid_fetch_cancel
  elapsed_seconds_range:
    min: 0
    max: 5
- label: cancelled_fetch
  error:
    contains:
    - cancel
    - cancelled
    - canceled
    - aborted
- label: cancelled_fetch
  sql_state: HY008
- label: cancelled_fetch
  elapsed_seconds_range:
    min: 0
    max: 30
- label: reused_statement
  no_exception: true
- label: reused_statement
  row_count: 1
- label: concurrent_cancel
  no_exception: true
- label: concurrent_cancelled_fetch
  elapsed_seconds_range:
    min: 0
    max: 30

Context

  • The behavior was first fixed in a DIFFERENT driver — reference PR: https://github.com/databricks/databricks-odbc/pull/362 — which seeded the shared language-neutral spec. This issue tracks the same conformance gap in databricks/databricks-sql-python; the reference PR is for cross-referencing the intended behavior, NOT a change to this repo.
  • Coverage PR carrying the reproducing xfail test(s): https://github.com/databricks/databricks-driver-test/pull/1562

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
      Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.