GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — commercial or sponsorship model? how best to grow project and improve quality? · Issue #85 · dotdevelop/dotdevelop

commercial or sponsorship model? how best to grow project and improve quality? #85

New issue
Copy link
New issue
Copy link
Open
Open
commercial or sponsorship model? how best to grow project and improve quality?#85
Copy link

Description

@pracplayopen
pracplayopen
opened on Sep 3, 2022
Issue body actions

having some small amount of experience building ides,
here are my primary concerns with dotdevelop:

  • no more MSFT and all that this entails

secondarily things like focus, fragmentation, interoperability are concerns. but really it's lack of bodies and backing.

if you have a bunch of devs chasing single issues that matter to them, not saying it can't work but it's very slow and you're going to lose a lot.

vscode isn't going to replace dotdevelop anytime soon imho, as monodevelop is still superior to it in many ways.

we have started using rider much, much more simply because:

  • it's better than monodevelop in most ways
  • it's better than vscode in most ways
  • it's cross platform
  • unlike MSFT they have good support

(no affiliation with rider, have tried it many times in past and found it lacking... but it's become quite an quality tool and since we switched entirely to linux and we can't go back to vs pro, and vscode is pretty basic... rider seems the most professional option for linux).

As such I'd like to suggest that if there are devs who really want to work on IDE development, please get together in this thread and figure out some sort of sponsorship model... whether it be typical open source + commercial, github sponsors / patreon or something else.... wiith everything that is happening and all the integrations required, it's gonna be hard to maintain any momenteum if you don't have something like this to build on.

No experts here on this w/respect to IDEs and the like. Obviously a community effort would work best.
For the time being we're going to get behind rider but if there is some momenteum amongst devs here for a more dedicated effort that makes sense, we might be able to contribute either some sponsorship or some coding.

Seems like it's pretty sparse so far, but there is a lot of little things monodevelop has that rider doesn't.

inspired by [issue #79 ]

Activity

  1. vanackerglenn commented on Sep 4, 2022

    @vanackerglenn
    vanackerglenn
    on Sep 4, 2022
    Collaborator
    More actions

    @pracplayopen I think the problem with having a sponsor is: where does the money go?
    A project like this should be maintained by people who believe in open source software, for the sake of it, not for financial reasons. Though it may help bring in new developers who want to make some money on the side of their day job, I believe it shouldn't be the main reason someone gets involved.
    I think once .Net5 is supported and we can distribute DotDevelop again as a package, that would incentivise more software devs to make the switch to linux, and maybe actively contribute to it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
      Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.