GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — Adding more to decorator docs by jocho-here · Pull Request #489 · encode/databases

This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 19, 2025. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@jocho-here

@jocho-here jocho-here commented May 17, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

I wasn't able to find a way to properly use the transaction decorator when using with other decorators in the docs.
I thought it would be helpful to add this portion so others can also be aware they need to put the decorator right above the function signature without going into the code and finding out about it themselves.

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
mgjo5899 and others added 3 commits May 17, 2022 01:10
mgjo5899
adding more to decorator docs
eb328d5
@collerek
Merge branch 'master' into adding-to-decorator-usage-docs
934d126
@aminalaee
Merge branch 'master' into adding-to-decorator-usage-docs
31d996c
aminalaee
aminalaee reviewed Jun 10, 2022
View reviewed changes
Comment thread docs/connections_and_transactions.md
```python
@router.post("/my-awesome-endpoint")
@database.transaction()
async def awesome_endpoint():

@aminalaee aminalaee Jun 10, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it would be better to mention something general that "If using multiple decorators, the @database.transaction() should be the most inner to the function definition. But maybe with better wording 😄

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Reviewers

1 more reviewer
@aminalaee aminalaee aminalaee left review comments
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

3 participants

@jocho-here @aminalaee @collerek
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.