GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — docs: Add Feast Chronon integration blog post by franciscojavierarceo · Pull Request #6954 · feast-dev/feast

Conversation

@franciscojavierarceo

@franciscojavierarceo franciscojavierarceo commented Oct 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What this PR does / why we need it:

Adds “Bringing Chronon Features to Feast” to the Feast blog, with an architecture diagram, source configuration, runnable demo commands, and the current integration boundaries. The post distinguishes the integration merged into master from the latest published release.

Also formats blog dates in UTC in all three renderers. The new post's 2026-10-05 date otherwise displayed as October 4 when built in America/New_York.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Documents the integration merged in #6188 and the operator support added in #6947.

Checks

  • I've made sure the relevant local checks are passing.
  • My commits are signed off (git commit -s).
  • My PR title follows conventional commits format.

Testing Strategy

  • Manual tests
    • npm run build in infra/website: all 32 pages built.
    • Ran the offline Chronon demo successfully.
    • Reviewed the rendered article, diagram, tables, and code examples.
    • Verified date formatting across four dates, four host timezones, and three renderers (48 checks), including DST boundaries.
    • git diff --check.

Misc

The Summit presentation is being updated separately and is not included in this PR. CI status will be reported by the checks on this PR.

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

chatgpt-codex-connector[bot] reacted with thumbs up emoji
All reactions
  • 👍 1 reaction
@franciscojavierarceo
franciscojavierarceo requested a review from a team as a code owner October 6, 2026 01:29
@franciscojavierarceo franciscojavierarceo added area/documentation kind/housekeeping release-note-none labels Oct 6, 2026
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 6, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-06T01:32:29.147868Z 85b56f2 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Oct 6, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ Please install the 'codecov app svg image' to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 49.07%. Comparing base (211ecb8) to head (e298c3c).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on master.
❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #6954   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   49.07%   49.07%           
=======================================
  Files         433      433           
  Lines       54330    54330           
  Branches     7917     7917           
=======================================
  Hits        26663    26663           
  Misses      25788    25788           
  Partials     1879     1879           
Flag Coverage Δ
go-feature-server 30.58% <ø> (ø)
python-unit 50.47% <ø> (ø)

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Harness.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 211ecb8...e298c3c. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.
All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

haoxu0
haoxu0 approved these changes Oct 7, 2026
View reviewed changes

@haoxu0 haoxu0 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
ntkathole
ntkathole approved these changes Oct 7, 2026
View reviewed changes
@franciscojavierarceo @ntkathole
docs: Add Feast Chronon integration blog post
e298c3c
Signed-off-by: Francisco Javier Arceo <[email protected]>
@ntkathole
ntkathole force-pushed the docs/chronon-integration-blog branch from 85b56f2 to e298c3c Compare October 7, 2026 04:37
@ntkathole
ntkathole merged commit 309c379 into master Oct 7, 2026
22 checks passed

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@ntkathole ntkathole ntkathole approved these changes
@haoxu0 haoxu0 haoxu0 approved these changes

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

area/documentation kind/housekeeping release-note-none

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

4 participants

@franciscojavierarceo @codecov-commenter @ntkathole @haoxu0
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.