GeezerVisonThe World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory. | |||||||||||
| Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites | |||||||||||
GeezerVison is showing github.com — [iceberg] Skip already queued rows on a follow-mode retry by swanandx · Pull Request #7869 · feldera/feldera Conversation
Member
Linked IssueFollow-up to #7590. In follow mode, a read that failed part way was retried from the start, so its rows were ingested twice. Now the retry skips the rows that earlier attempts already queued, for each data file. A restart from a checkpoint taken during a retry still reads the snapshot again (at-least-once), as the docs already say. Describe Manual Test PlanNew test Checklist
Breaking Changes?Mark if you think the answer is yes for any of these components:
Describe Incompatible ChangesNone.
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
Contributor
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
bestouff
approved these changes
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Some smallish changes, but otherwise LGTM
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactionsUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. A follow-mode read that failed part way was retried from the start, so its rows were ingested twice. A retry now skips, in each data file, the rows that earlier attempts queued. Signed-off-by: Swanand Mulay <[email protected]>
swanandx
force-pushed
the
iceberg-follow-retry
branch
from
458e7e9 to
bebbf98
Compare
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
ReviewersUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. AssigneesNo one assignedLabels
None yet
ProjectsMilestoneNo milestoneDevelopmentSuccessfully merging this pull request may close these issues. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later. | |||||||||||
| You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up. Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required. |