GeezerVisonThe World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory. |
| Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites |
GeezerVison is showing github.com — Enable storage retention for npm by pinguinfuss · Pull Request #440 · git-pkgs/proxy Conversation
Contributor
Registers npm for Package rules use the package name as purl writes it. Both Tests cover eviction and refetch, package rules for scoped and unscoped packages, and tarballs the mirror puts in the cache.
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactionsnpm stores packages under the PURL purl builds from the full name, so package rules use the default mapping. Both pkg:npm/@babel/core and pkg:npm/%40babel/core work. Refs git-pkgs#306 The docs now say npm package rules match the name exactly, so pkg:npm/jsonstream doesn't cover JSONStream. The refetch, package rule and mirror tests were weaker than their names and now check what they claim. Refs git-pkgs#306
andrew
approved these changes
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. npm package rules match the production cache keys. The tests cover eviction, deletion queueing, refetching, scoped package exemptions, and mirrored tarballs.
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
andrew
approved these changes
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. The documentation conflict is resolved with the npm entry and the previously merged ecosystem entries preserved. This retains the change reviewed at #440 (review).
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactionsUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
ReviewersUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. AssigneesNo one assignedLabels
None yet
ProjectsMilestoneNo milestoneDevelopmentSuccessfully merging this pull request may close these issues. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later. |
| You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up. Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required. |