GeezerVisonThe World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GeezerVison is showing github.com — Bump artifact dependencies if `CODEQL_ACTION_ARTIFACT_V4_UPGRADE` enabled by angelapwen · Pull Request #2482 · github/codeql-action Conversation
|
|
Pushed a commit to update the checked-in dependencies. Please mark the PR as ready for review to trigger PR checks. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
💭 People who have workflows using |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice. Some suggestions inline.
+2,174,754 −72,459
Productive day! 🎉 😄
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
Holding on this as I investigate internal reports that #2475 has caused some regressions |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
26b076b to
35684ba
Compare
|
Pushed a commit to update the checked-in dependencies. Please mark the PR as ready for review to trigger PR checks. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
CODEQL_ACTION_ARTIFACT_UPGRADE enabled
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the extra work here to get this behind a feature flag and provide a smooth upgrade path! ✨
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
e96bc99 to
fbe39bd
Compare
|
Pushed a commit to update the checked-in dependencies. Please mark the PR as ready for review to trigger PR checks. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
CODEQL_ACTION_ARTIFACT_UPGRADE enabledCODEQL_ACTION_ARTIFACT_V2_UPGRADE enabled
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good. The test makes sense, but I just want to make sure it is easy to maintain.
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
| - stable-v2.13.5 | ||
| - stable-v2.14.6 | ||
| - stable-v2.15.5 | ||
| - stable-v2.16.6 | ||
| - stable-v2.17.6 | ||
| - default | ||
| - linked | ||
| - nightly-latest |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are we not testing 2.18 or 2.19? How will we maintain this list going forward? Same question for the set of versions below.
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We try to keep the list of versions in the checks that don't use the PR check generator consistent with the sync.py file:
codeql-action/pr-checks/sync.py
Lines 9 to 28 in 46e0c78
| defaultTestVersions = [ | |
| # The oldest supported CodeQL version. If bumping, update `CODEQL_MINIMUM_VERSION` in `codeql.ts` | |
| "stable-v2.13.5", | |
| # The last CodeQL release in the 2.14 series. | |
| "stable-v2.14.6", | |
| # The last CodeQL release in the 2.15 series. | |
| "stable-v2.15.5", | |
| # The last CodeQL release in the 2.16 series. | |
| "stable-v2.16.6", | |
| # The last CodeQL release in the 2.17 series. | |
| "stable-v2.17.6", | |
| # The default version of CodeQL for Dotcom, as determined by feature flags. | |
| "default", | |
| # The version of CodeQL shipped with the Action in `defaults.json`. During the release process | |
| # for a new CodeQL release, there will be a period of time during which this will be newer than | |
| # the default version on Dotcom. | |
| "linked", | |
| # A nightly build directly from the our private repo, built in the last 24 hours. | |
| "nightly-latest" | |
| ] |
default is currently 2.19.0, so looks like we'll need to add 2.18.6 to the list. I'll open up a separate internal issue to track that.
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Co-authored-by: Andrew Eisenberg <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks great. Just a couple of comments about whether we can avoid the confusion between the npm and Action versions by always talking about the Action versions, in line with the public changelog posts.
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
There is some kind of unrelated CI incident related to Docker so will have to re-run these checks later~ |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice! A couple of small suggestions, but this looks good!
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
| */ | ||
| export enum Feature { | ||
| ArtifactV2Upgrade = "artifact_v2_upgrade", | ||
| ArtifactV4Upgrade = "artifact_v2_upgrade", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we also update the name of the feature flag?
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good point — forgot to do that because we don't really use that value. Fixed!
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
| } else if (!(await features.getValue(Feature.ArtifactV4Upgrade))) { | ||
| logger.info( | ||
| "Uploading debug artifacts using the `@actions/artifact@v1` client because the value of the relevant feature flag is false. To use the `v2` version of the client, set the `CODEQL_ACTION_ARTIFACT_V2_UPGRADE` environment variable to true.", | ||
| "Debug artifacts can be consumed with `actions/download-artifact@v3` because the value of the relevant feature flag is false. To use the `actions/download-artifact@v4`, set the `CODEQL_ACTION_ARTIFACT_V4_UPGRADE` environment variable to true.", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd suggest we drop "because the value of the relevant feature flag is false" here, since customers shouldn't need to know about feature flags.
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Makes sense 👍 to them it's just behind an environment variable. Done!
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Co-authored-by: Henry Mercer <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good, just one merge conflict to resolve in the changelog.
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
CODEQL_ACTION_ARTIFACT_V2_UPGRADE enabledCODEQL_ACTION_ARTIFACT_V4_UPGRADE enabled
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.