GeezerVisonThe World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory. | ||||||||||||||
| Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites | ||||||||||||||
GeezerVison is showing github.com — Allow abstracting over `process.env` by mbg · Pull Request #3993 · github/codeql-action Conversation
Member
Two straight-forward commits cherry-picked from #3990 (and, in turn, #3973) which add an Not used in this PR, but cherry-picked so that we can hopefully merge it relatively quickly and make use of it elsewhere. Risk assessmentFor internal use only. Please select the risk level of this change:
Which use cases does this change impact?Environments:
How did/will you validate this change?
If something goes wrong after this change is released, what are the mitigation and rollback strategies?
How will you know if something goes wrong after this change is released?
Are there any special considerations for merging or releasing this change?
Merge / deployment checklist
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Warning
Pull request overviewThis PR introduces a small abstraction layer over environment access to avoid hard-coding Changes:
Show a summary per file
Review detailsFiles excluded by content exclusion policy (1)
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)src/util.ts:588
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactionsUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
sam-robson
approved these changes
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. LGTM 👍🏻
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactionsUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
This was referenced
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Reviewers
Copilot code review
Copilot
Copilot review effort
Applies to this pull request for everyone.Learn more about Copilot code review.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. AssigneesLabels
size/S
ProjectsMilestoneNo milestoneDevelopmentSuccessfully merging this pull request may close these issues. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later. | ||||||||||||||
| You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up. Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required. |