GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — Current project status - Maintainers wanted · Issue #539 · github-tools/github

Current project status - Maintainers wanted #539

New issue
Copy link
New issue
Copy link
Closed
Closed
Current project status - Maintainers wanted#539
Copy link

Description

@DanielRuf
DanielRuf
opened on Jan 31, 2019
Issue body actions

Hi, what is the current status of this project? Is it still actively maintained?

Activity

Next
  1. clayreimann commented on Mar 31, 2019

    @clayreimann
    clayreimann
    on Mar 31, 2019
    Member
    More actions

    @DanielRuf Not by me. Can't speak to @Aendrew, @AurelioDeRosa, or some of the other usual suspects from when I worked on the project. But given that we're going on 18 months w/o a commit I think we could use some new blood

    Reacted by 周泽勇 and ufire
  2. AurelioDeRosa commented on Mar 31, 2019

    @AurelioDeRosa
    AurelioDeRosa
    on Mar 31, 2019
    Member
    More actions

    Things have definitely changed for me since I contributed to this project. So, new contributors are very welcome.

  3. clayreimann
    changed the title [-]Current project status[/-] [+]Current project status - Maintainers wanted[/+] on Mar 31, 2019
  4. clayreimann commented on Mar 31, 2019

    @clayreimann
    clayreimann
    on Mar 31, 2019
    Member
    More actions

    @AurelioDeRosa it looks like you and Ændrew are the only to admins in github-tools so you guys are the only ones who will be able to onboard new contributors. I've updated the readme with a link to this issue so if you see notifications in the near future it would be great if volunteers were addressed quickly.

  5. j-rewerts commented on Apr 5, 2019

    @j-rewerts
    j-rewerts
    on Apr 5, 2019
    Member
    More actions

    How would I go about becoming more actively involved?

  6. j-rewerts commented on Apr 5, 2019

    @j-rewerts
    j-rewerts
    on Apr 5, 2019
    Member
    More actions

    It looks like it has the odd PR to review. 😄

    I have contributions I'd like to make as well, though they may have been made in one of the PRs.

  7. clayreimann commented on Apr 5, 2019

    @clayreimann
    clayreimann
    on Apr 5, 2019
    Member
    More actions

    @j-rewerts if you wanted to start reviewing PRs I can merge PRs that you think look good.

    Unfortunately I can’t give you write access myself

  8. j-rewerts commented on Apr 5, 2019

    @j-rewerts
    j-rewerts
    on Apr 5, 2019
    Member
    More actions

    No worries! I'll familiarize myself with the project and make a couple changes. Then I'll start looking through the list. Would you or some of the other current maintainers be willing to work with me in the transition period?

    Reacted by ufire
    Reacted by ufire
  9. AurelioDeRosa commented on Apr 5, 2019

    @AurelioDeRosa
    AurelioDeRosa
    on Apr 5, 2019
    Member
    More actions

    @clayreimann I just made you an owner. I hope this unlocks the situation.

  10. CodyGramlich commented on Apr 7, 2019

    @CodyGramlich
    CodyGramlich
    on Apr 7, 2019
    Contributor
    More actions

    I'm interested in contributing to this project too

    Reacted by Jared Rewerts
  11. clayreimann commented on Apr 7, 2019

    @clayreimann
    clayreimann
    on Apr 7, 2019
    Member
    More actions

    @CodyGramlich that’s good to hear. Feel free to start reviewing open PRs. If you tag me in a comment saying that a PR is good, a duplicate, or can be closed I’ll get on it

    Reacted by Cody Gramlich
  12. kylejeske commented on Apr 16, 2019

    @kylejeske
    kylejeske
    on Apr 16, 2019
    More actions

    Things have definitely changed for me since I contributed to this project. So, new contributors are very welcome.

    I'd be interested in contributing. Let me know how I can be of some use.

    Reacted by FreakinKAT_Again
  13. clayreimann commented on Apr 17, 2019

    @clayreimann
    clayreimann
    on Apr 17, 2019
    Member
    More actions

    @kylejeske I would echo the same advice I gave to @j-rewerts and CodyGramlich

    Feel free to start reviewing open PRs. If you tag me in a comment saying that a PR is good, a duplicate, or can be closed I’ll get on it

    Though now you'll be able to tag @j-rewerts, as I've just given him write access as well.

    Reacted by FreakinKAT_Again
  14. WJXHenry commented on May 2, 2019

    @WJXHenry
    WJXHenry
    on May 2, 2019
    Contributor
    More actions

    Hi! I'd like to contribute to this repo as well.

    Reacted by FreakinKAT_Again
  15. tamer1an commented on Jul 4, 2019

    @tamer1an
    tamer1an
    on Jul 4, 2019
    Contributor
    More actions

    Hi I also have some parts done on my side for branch protection

  16. 12 remaining items

  17. sustained commented on Jan 12, 2020

    @sustained
    sustained
    on Jan 12, 2020
    More actions

    I'll look into the code and see if I understand it enough, if I do maybe I could help at least somewhat.

    I have a lot of experience, it's just that I never wrote an API wrapper before.

    Reacted by Sara Tasche
  18. sovoid commented on Mar 18, 2020

    @sovoid
    sovoid
    on Mar 18, 2020
    More actions

    Hi @Aendrew I would love to maintain and contribute to the project if possible. I've been using it for quite some time now and have looked at and understood the code base as well

    Reacted by Sara Tasche
  19. maneeshms commented on Apr 21, 2020

    @maneeshms
    maneeshms
    on Apr 21, 2020
    More actions

    Hi @Aendrew , I am also interested to contribute to the project.

  20. varunsingh87 commented on Jun 2, 2020

    @varunsingh87
    varunsingh87
    on Jun 2, 2020
    More actions

    Hello, I would like to contribute to this open source!

    Reacted by -, Varun Singh and Gene Merrill
  21. JakeKo commented on Jul 10, 2020

    @JakeKo
    JakeKo
    on Jul 10, 2020
    More actions

    I would also like to contribute to this project.

  22. 9trocode commented on Aug 10, 2020

    @9trocode
    9trocode
    on Aug 10, 2020
    More actions

    I would love to contribute to this project

  23. kaus-rai commented on Oct 2, 2020

    @kaus-rai
    kaus-rai
    on Oct 2, 2020
    More actions

    Hi @Aendrew I would like to contribute in the project

  24. garimasingh128 commented on Jan 1, 2021

    @garimasingh128
    garimasingh128
    on Jan 1, 2021
    More actions

    I would also like to contribute to this project.

  25. j-rewerts commented on Jan 24, 2021

    @j-rewerts
    j-rewerts
    on Jan 24, 2021
    Member
    More actions

    Hi @garimasingh128 and @FrostyTheDumDum! Apologies for not responding sooner. The last time I worked on this project, the decision had been made to deprecate this library (#564). That being said, if we had a few people that could maintain the library, maybe that would change. Either way, it would be work, as deprecating this library in favour of OctoKit would require some work probably.

    If you'd like to contribute, please get your environment set up. I'm going to update the getting started guide so it doesn't depend on my test user. Feel free to email me at [email protected] for assistance. Once you've got a few PRs in, I'll start working on getting you ownership over build/release if you're interested.

    Reacted by Garima Singh
  26. DanielRuf
    closed this as completedon Sep 30, 2021
  27. rilysh commented on Aug 13, 2022

    @rilysh
    rilysh
    on Aug 13, 2022
    More actions

    Hi there. It's been more than one year last commit was done. From there GitHub have a lot more updates recently, and I'd like to maintain GitHub.js. Can anyone kindly add me here via a GitHub organizational invite? Or should I fork it instead? What do you prefer folks?

    Reacted by Ryan Munil Lee
  28. the-watchmaker commented on Mar 11, 2023

    @the-watchmaker
    the-watchmaker
    on Mar 11, 2023
    More actions

    Hi, I would like to maintain. I just started building an app around it. Would love to contribute.

  29. DanielRuf commented on Mar 11, 2023

    @DanielRuf
    DanielRuf
    on Mar 11, 2023
    Author
    More actions

    @the-watchmaker feel free to provide PRs and provide solutions to open issues.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
      Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.