GeezerVison is showing github.com — Add missing info in Submodule.remove docstring by EliahKagan · Pull Request #1714 · gitpython-developers/GitPython
Conversation
EliahKagan
commented
Oct 18, 2023
•
edited
Loading
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Fixes #1712
This rewords and adds some missing information to the docstring of Submodule.remove, for the method parameter, discussed in #1712. It uses the second suggestion presented in that issue, formatted in the style of the surrounding docstring (an 88-column wrap).
It also does some other rewording in that docstring, for clarity, at the end of that same section (on the method parameter), and a small punctuation fix in the section about the force parameter.
A note on coordination
Please note that, while this is not a behavioral change, I believe an ordinary patch release rather than a "post" release should be made if this is included. In particular, although I discussed doing a "post" release in #1715, a release that includes both this change and the changes from #1715 should be a normal 3.1.39 release. (In contrast, if this modified only files such as README.md or documentation in doc/, then a post release would make sense.)
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
This rewords and adds some missing information to the docstring of
Submodule.remove, for the "method" parameter, discussed in gitpython-developers#1712.
It uses the second suggestion presented in that issue, formatted
in the style of the surrounding docstring (an 88-column wrap).
It also does some other rewording in that docstring, for clarity,
at the end of that same section (on the "method" parameter), and a
small punctuation fix in the section about the "force" parameter.
This was referenced Oct 18, 2023
|
Thanks so much for your help, it's much appreciated!
I will happily not make the next release a "post" release as suggested (after looking it up), merely because I have never done it before and am afraid that this breaks anything or anyone downstream 😅.
|
EliahKagan reacted with thumbs up emoji
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
EliahKagan
commented
Oct 18, 2023
•
edited
Loading
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
That makes sense, and as I've just written about in #1716, I think there's another change that might make sense to include in 3.1.39 [edit: or 3.1.40], if the timing works out.
Otherwise, it, or some alternative to it, could come in with 3.1.40 [edit: or 3.1.41] later.
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Assignees
No one assigned
Milestone
No milestone
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
|