GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — Add support for Python 3.15 by hugovk · Pull Request #2183 · gitpython-developers/GitPython

Conversation

@hugovk

@hugovk hugovk commented Jul 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The Python 3.15 beta is out. 🚀

The 3.15 release manager (👋 hi, that's me!) said:

We strongly encourage maintainers of third-party Python projects to test with 3.15 during the beta phase and report issues found to the Python bug tracker as soon as possible. While the release is planned to be feature-complete entering the beta phase, it is possible that features may be modified or, in rare cases, removed up until the start of the release candidate phase (2026-08-04). Our goal is to have no ABI changes after beta 4 and as few code changes as possible after the first release candidate. To achieve that, it will be extremely important to get as much exposure for 3.15 as possible during the beta phase.

This includes creating pre-release wheels for 3.15, as it helps other projects to do their own testing. However, we recommend that your regular production releases wait until 3.15.0rc1, to avoid the risk of ABI breaks.

Also declare support for 3.13-3.15 with Trove classifiers.

And includes a suggestion: stop testing free-threaded 3.13t. It was experimental, 3.14t and up are properly supported and have better performance, and many other projects are stopping testing 3.13t, such as cibuildwheel and Pillow.

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
hugovk added 3 commits July 23, 2026 22:53
@hugovk
Declare support for Python 3.13-3.14
904aa71
@hugovk
Add support for Python 3.15
7d5370d
@hugovk
Stop testing experimental 3.13t
8a92182
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings July 23, 2026 20:32
Copilot started reviewing on behalf of hugovk July 23, 2026 20:35
View session
Copilot AI reviewed Jul 23, 2026
View reviewed changes

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Adds CI coverage and packaging metadata updates to recognize and exercise Python 3.15 (including free-threaded builds) during the beta period, aligning GitPython’s declared support with current upstream Python testing guidance.

Changes:

  • Add Trove classifiers for Python 3.13–3.15 in setup.py.
  • Extend the GitHub Actions test matrix to run on Python 3.15 / 3.15t and stop testing 3.13t.
  • Mark 3.15 / 3.15t as “experimental” to enable actions/setup-python pre-release installs via allow-prereleases.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File Description
setup.py Adds Trove classifiers for Python 3.13–3.15 to reflect supported versions.
.github/workflows/pythonpackage.yml Updates CI matrix to add 3.15/3.15t and remove 3.13t, enabling prereleases for 3.15 via allow-prereleases.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
Byron
Byron reviewed Jul 24, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment thread .github/workflows/pythonpackage.yml
python-version: "3.13" # FIXME: Fix and enable Python 3.13 and 3.14 on Windows (#1955).
- os-type: windows
python-version: "3.13t"
python-version: "3.13" # FIXME: Fix and enable Python 3.13-3.15 on Windows (#1955).

@Byron Byron Jul 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@EliahKagan I wonder if this comment is still valid? We have been running on Windows for a while, even though maybe not with all tests enabled.

My hope would be that with the improvements to deterministic destruction, more tests can work as filehandles will be closed more reliably.

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions

@EliahKagan EliahKagan Jul 24, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The semantics of os.path.isabs changed in Python 3.13 on Windows. This had caused the behavior of code like index.remove('/only/looks/absolute') to differ, such that it was not immediately obvious what the behavior should be. It caused a test to fail, but that could not reasonably be fixed without figuring out what ought to actually happen.

I think it's very likely that GitPython has or had bugs that would make this behavior wrong both before and after the chage, though I am not sure. Really, all uses of os.path.isabs, including when spelling it osp.isabs after import os.path as osp, should be audited, and also compared to the uses of the is_absolute method of Path, which I believe had always regarded paths beginning with a single separator as non-absolute on Windows.

I had meant to fix this in #1955 but that ended up stalling due to my inability to put much time into GitPython at the time, and I very much agree with its closure--I should've myself closed it much earlier, to make clearer to others that they should feel welcome to contribute tests and fixes.

To be clear, paths on Windows that start with a single / or \ are indeed not absolute, because they are relative to the current drive. (A path that starts with a single / on a Unix-like system is of course absolute.) However, it may be that existing code in GitPython also assumes that, even on Windows, all relative paths are relative to a specific directory, rather than unconditionally specifying a root directory but relative to the current drive. So the way GitPython handles relative and absolute paths in general, including but not limited to when it uses os.path.isabs or pathlib.Path.is_absolute or related functions, should be examined in case there are bugs.

I suspect that, these days, all of this can be examined, and any findings rechecked and remediated, fairly efficiently.

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Byron reacted with thumbs up emoji
All reactions
  • 👍 1 reaction

@Byron Byron Jul 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks so much for the clarification. It took me a while to realize that a leading slash means relative to the current drive, as opposed to the current dir which I was auto-correcting this into :D.

GitPython doesn't have the infrastructure yet for discussion to keep track of things, probably also because I don't feel too compelled to actually do it 😅. Maybe once Gitoxide is in a place where it could be integrated I will feel the need to do a quality push.

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
Byron
Byron approved these changes Jul 24, 2026
View reviewed changes

@Byron Byron left a comment •
edited
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What an honor, thanks a lot for setting this up for us!

And of course, good to see that it just works!

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
@Byron
Byron merged commit be5031d into gitpython-developers:main Jul 24, 2026
32 checks passed

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@Byron Byron Byron approved these changes
@EliahKagan EliahKagan EliahKagan left review comments
Copilot code review Copilot
Copilot review effort
Applies to this pull request for everyone.Learn more about Copilot code review.
Copilot left review comments

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

4 participants

@hugovk @Byron @EliahKagan
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.