GeezerVisonThe World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
GeezerVison is showing github.com — Read git's yes/no and on/off booleans in get_value by rawsun007 · Pull Request #2229 · gitpython-developers/GitPython Conversation
Contributor
Returning them as strings is worse than merely inexact: if repo.config_reader().get_value("core", "someflag"): is True for a value git reads as false, and nothing raises.
Deliberately not included: Validation:
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactionsgit accepts yes/no and on/off for a boolean as well as true/false
(git_parse_maybe_bool_text in parse.c), and ConfigParser.getboolean on this
class already accepted all of them. _string_to_value handled only true/false,
under a comment claiming to "try boolean values as git uses them", so the two
accessors disagreed about the same file:
value get_value() getboolean() git config --type=bool
yes 'yes' True true
no 'no' False false
on 'on' True true
off 'off' False false
Returning them as strings was worse than merely inexact. "no" and "off" are
non-empty, so a caller testing the result of get_value got True for a value
git reads as false — the inversion is silent, since nothing raises.
_string_to_value now recognises the same spellings getboolean does. A value
that is not a boolean is untouched, so "meld" is still returned as a string,
and numeric values keep their existing behavior.
Not changed here: get_value also diverges on numeric bases and suffixes
("0x10" and "1k" come back as strings, "010" as 10 where git reads octal 8).
Those change the value rather than its type and are worth their own commit.
Validation: test_get_value_reads_git_boolean_spellings covers the ten
spellings and asserts the two accessors agree; it fails on the previous
revision. test/test_config.py passes (40 passed, 2 skipped), ruff check and
ruff format are clean. test/test_repo.py errors on this clone because
init-tests-after-clone.sh has not been run, unchanged by this commit.
Member
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
ReviewersNo reviewsUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. AssigneesNo one assignedLabels
None yet
MilestoneNo milestoneDevelopmentSuccessfully merging this pull request may close these issues. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up. Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required. |