GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — maven package is released with an old version of guava version in META-INF, which triggers security alerts · Issue #4536 · graphql-java/graphql-java

maven package is released with an old version of guava version in META-INF, which triggers security alerts #4536

New issue
Copy link
New issue
Copy link
Open
Open
maven package is released with an old version of guava version in META-INF, which triggers security alerts#4536
Copy link

Description

@ghlocaltests
ghlocaltests
opened on Nov 4, 2026
Issue body actions

Hi team,

Our security scanner reported an issue regarding to old guava libs (32.1.2-jre), even after we have upgrade the dependency in maven.

After some investigations, we found that this lib is introduced from

<graphq-java-<version>.jar>/META-INF/maven/com.google.guava/guava/pom.xml and pom.properties:

groupId=com.google.guava
artifactId=guava
version=32.1.2-jre
  <parent>
    <groupId>com.google.guava</groupId>
    <artifactId>guava-parent</artifactId>
    <version>32.1.2-jre</version>
  </parent>

which will trigger the CVE alert by the scanner.

If possible can this maven directory in MEAT-INF removed ?

Activity

  1. bclozel commented on Nov 4, 2026

    @bclozel
    bclozel
    on Nov 4, 2026
    More actions

    Hello @ghlocaltests

    full disclosure: I'm not a graphql-java maintainer.

    Those META-INF files should be kept because they do reflect the fact that part of guava is being shaded in the graphql-java JAR. Now for the CVE part of this issue, you should have a look at #4498 and #4530 to get a better understanding of the situation. I'm sure the team will reply there in due time.

    I think you can close this issue in favor of the other two.
    Cheers.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
      Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.