GeezerVison is showing github.com — html5lib-python development needs funding · Issue #361 · html5lib/html5lib-python
html5lib-python development needs funding #361DescriptionThis project is big enough and critical enough that it needs funded maintainers.
As suggested in #282 (comment)
you should create an opencollective account for html5lib
Other ideas?
Who works for a company that will sponsor html5lib-python development? Reacted by Boris and Chih-Hsuan Yen Reacted by Boris Activitygsnedders commented on Nov 21, 2017 FWIW, last I knew things were a bit painful with most of the US-based sites and non-US contributors drawing from them. (And things generally get pretty horribly mirky for me with UK tax rules.) jayvdb commented on Nov 23, 2017 whyboris commented on May 15, 2018 Reacted by Boris and Juan Luis Cano Rodríguez ewwink commented on Jan 6, 2019 it better to put on the front page that this project need sponsor. Reacted by Boris and Karthikeyan Singaravelan hugovk commented on Mar 10, 2019 hugovk commented on Mar 14, 2019 The Linux Foundation has launched CommunityBridge to help with funding, security and mentoring.
icemac commented on Apr 17, 2019 Reacted by Hugo van Kemenade, Boris, Sam Sneddon, John Vandenberg, Michael R. Crusoe and Blaine Bublitz Reacted by Boris, Sam Sneddon and Blaine Bublitz twm commented on Jun 5, 2019 Who would actually be the maintainer if there were funding available? Are any of the current maintainers seeking funding? gsnedders commented on Jun 6, 2019 @twm As of next month I should have the time to actually work on html5lib, provided I'm paid for it. phated commented on Jun 14, 2019 We'd love to have one or more maintainer join Tidelift to receive funding for html5lib!! Are there any questions I could answer for you? tirkarthi commented on Jun 18, 2019 jayaddison commented on Jan 11, 2021 Initially I was supportive of this issue, but at the moment I'm a little less certain.
Would it be possible to state what processes would help to keep html5lib-python moving forward first, and then use those factors to determine what's required (funding / governance / other)?
While stability and safety of the parser are paramount (first do no harm, basically), there's a low but ongoing and manageable volume of contributor activity on the project that could help improve correctness and potentially performance too, and it'd be beneficial to find a way to include those. Reacted by Boris and Aarni Koskela
MetadataMetadataDevelopmentNo branches or pull requestsIssue actions
|
