GeezerVisonThe World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory. | |||||||||||||||||||
| Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites | |||||||||||||||||||
GeezerVison is showing github.com — fix: move base images to distroless cc-debian13 by ravisingal · Pull Request #59 · hypertrace/docker-java-base Conversation
Contributor
WhyDebian 12 (bookworm) is approaching the end of its full-support window. This moves the runtime base for both Java images to Changes
TestingBoth images built locally on amd64 and arm64:
The zlib assertion was also checked against a deliberately bad path to confirm it fails the build rather than passing silently. Remaining build warnings are pre-existing 🤖 Generated with Claude Code
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactionsDebian 12 (bookworm) is approaching the end of its full-support window, so move the runtime base for both Java images to gcr.io/distroless/cc-debian13. The helper stages move to trixie alongside it so the JRE and jemalloc are built against the same glibc (2.41) as the runtime base, and the SSL stage moves to java-base-debian13 so the Java cacerts come from a matching release. cc-debian13 already ships zlib (libz.so.1 -> libz.so.1.3.1), unlike cc-debian12, so copying libz in from the build stage is no longer needed. Replace it with an assertion that the base still provides the library, left unversioned so a routine zlib patch bump does not break the weekly update-docker-args PR. Verified by building both images on amd64 and arm64: java 11.0.33 and 21.0.13 start, jemalloc preloads, cacerts are present, and the eMudhra blocked.certs entry survives jlink. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
ravisingal
requested review from
JBAhire,
aaron-steinfeld and
kotharironak
as code owners
Contributor
Author
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
hibohra1398
approved these changes
aaron-steinfeld
approved these changes
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
ReviewersUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. AssigneesNo one assignedLabels
None yet
ProjectsMilestoneNo milestoneDevelopmentSuccessfully merging this pull request may close these issues. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later. | |||||||||||||||||||
| You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up. Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required. |