GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — Biased bot. Really. · Issue #368 · javascript-tutorial/es.javascript.info

Biased bot. Really. #368

New issue
Copy link
New issue
Copy link
Closed
Closed
Biased bot. Really.#368
Copy link

Description

@joaquinelio
joaquinelio
opened on Sep 1, 2020
Issue body actions

@iliakan
sorry to bother you again, about your kid.
He keeps unchecking these articles,
Perhaps considering they need renaming? (note "\")

bot

Activity

  1. iliakan commented on Sep 1, 2020

    @iliakan
    iliakan
    on Sep 1, 2020
    Member
    More actions

    @joaquinelio Sure thanks, could you explain in few words what has happened?

  2. joaquinelio commented on Sep 1, 2020

    @joaquinelio
    joaquinelio
    on Sep 1, 2020
    MemberAuthor
    More actions

    just that, 3 translated articles, I check them, then bot unchecks.

    I guess it is because of the \ considering they need to be renamed.

    No right in the moment I check them, but when "he" goes to edit some other thing,
    last time in the moment an article was taken

    all at once the bot:

    • Added user (@EzequielCaste) to article "indexedDB"
    • Removed [X] from 3 articles: (maybe renamed because it erases @ user and # PR too)
      -Unicode: flag "u" and class \p{...}
      -Word boundary: \b
      -Backreferences in pattern: \N and \k

    the 3 with a backslash
    the 3 from @cortizg , I guess just a funny coincidence

  3. joaquinelio commented on Sep 3, 2020

    @joaquinelio
    joaquinelio
    on Sep 3, 2020
    MemberAuthor
    More actions

    ...oops he did it again
    @iliakan , Don Bot needs vacation

    User mariomenjr took an article,
    then Bot modified issue17. Again, in a single update :

    1. Added user to the article, OK:
      [ ] ArrayBuffer, binary arrays (@mariomenjr)

    2. Removed [X] from the same 3 articles:
      -Unicode: flag "u" and class \p{...}
      -Word boundary: \b
      -Backreferences in pattern: \N and \k

    I know it's him. It's recorded in the issue17 update history.
    image

    0002

    Though I couldn't get issue history via API.

    (Bot is failing in adding PR to the issue too, -mariomenjr Bubbling and capturing #372- but I dont care)

  4. iliakan commented on Sep 3, 2020

    @iliakan
    iliakan
    on Sep 3, 2020
    Member
    More actions

    I didn't fix it yet, quite a lot of debugging after putting escapes in.

  5. joaquinelio commented on Sep 3, 2020

    @joaquinelio
    joaquinelio
    on Sep 3, 2020
    MemberAuthor
    More actions

    ah, ok, I though you didnt believe me, sorry =)
    it's not a fatal err anyway, I'll put the X X X back.

  6. iliakan commented on Sep 3, 2020

    @iliakan
    iliakan
    on Sep 3, 2020
    Member
    More actions

    @joaquinelio I introduced some changes, hope that will fix the problem. But the change is quite deep in the bot code, so let me know if anything's still wrong.

  7. joaquinelio commented on Sep 8, 2020

    @joaquinelio
    joaquinelio
    on Sep 8, 2020
    MemberAuthor
    More actions

    There is a step Mr Bot miss:

    Translator claims (valid) - OK
    Translator claims (taken) - OK
    Translator put a PR - ?
    Labeling flow - OK
    Maint. merge a PR - OK

    The problem started before your big fix, I didn't mind too much.
    The important issue is solved 👍

    Example:
    #374
    [The clickjacking attack] | (@homero304) | 2020-09-01 | #374

    Edit:
    Should it remove "Ready to merge" after merge? Can't say why, unless obsessiveness. Just kidding, nice work =)

  8. iliakan commented on Sep 9, 2020

    @iliakan
    iliakan
    on Sep 9, 2020
    Member
    More actions

    @joaquinelio Again, what's the problem exactly?

    This looks perfectly fine:
    image

    Or did you fix anything manually?

  9. joaquinelio commented on Sep 9, 2020

    @joaquinelio
    joaquinelio
    on Sep 9, 2020
    MemberAuthor
    More actions

    Yes, we do it manually.

    The table is valid

    Translator claims (valid) - OK
    Translator claims (taken) - OK
    Translator put a PR - ?
    Labeling flow - OK
    Maint. merge a PR - OK (with #PR already there)

    ===
    Not an important bug. I commented it just in case you are curious. Or obsessive.

    We put it manually just because it is nice to have this tracking,
    and Don Bot seems happy to check [X] when we merge.
    I dont mind to help Don Bot...

  10. iliakan commented on Sep 10, 2020

    @iliakan
    iliakan
    on Sep 10, 2020
    Member
    More actions

    I'd like to fix that.

    You mean that when translator puts a PR - nothing happens? Even if the PR title matches the article title?

  11. joaquinelio commented on Sep 10, 2020

    @joaquinelio
    joaquinelio
    on Sep 10, 2020
    MemberAuthor
    More actions

    Exactly.

    Thats why I put the verified example.
    Other times they dont match case, sometimes the PR is renamed after, so it's ok they miss.

  12. iliakan commented on Sep 12, 2020

    @iliakan
    iliakan
    on Sep 12, 2020
    Member
    More actions

    @joaquinelio Thank you. That's because people developing https://github.com/octokit/rest.js/ just LOVE to rename methods with every release. Like no one. A release is failure for them if they don't rename a half of their methods.

    I updated the method call name, should work now ;)

    Reacted by joaquinelio
  13. iliakan
    closed this as completedon Sep 12, 2020
  14. iliakan commented on Sep 12, 2020

    @iliakan
    iliakan
    on Sep 12, 2020
    Member
    More actions

    Thank you for precise explanations of the errors :)

  15. joaquinelio commented on Sep 12, 2020

    @joaquinelio
    joaquinelio
    on Sep 12, 2020
    MemberAuthor
    More actions

    Experience.
    I dont believe users either 🤞

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
      Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.