GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — Prototype methods, objects without __proto__ by cortizg · Pull Request #195 · javascript-tutorial/es.javascript.info

Conversation

@cortizg

@cortizg cortizg commented May 18, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
@javascript-translate-bot javascript-translate-bot added the review needed label May 18, 2020
@javascript-translate-bot
javascript-translate-bot requested a review from a team May 18, 2020 01:26
@iliakan iliakan mentioned this pull request May 18, 2020
Spanish Translation Progress #17
Open
@cortizg
1-08-04-pm Traducido 15
d96e8e1
1-08-04-pm Corregido 14

1-08-04-pm Corregido 15
joaquinelio
joaquinelio requested changes May 25, 2020
View reviewed changes

@joaquinelio joaquinelio left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Bien, sugiero el rearmado de algunas frases.

no se si se debe modificar
index.md (se usa como link, aunque también para mostrar menú)
los svg (y que no sé cómo probar desde acá) creo haber leído que se llaman con parámetros y no se debían modificar pero no pude encontrar dónde.

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
Comment thread 1-js/08-prototypes/04-prototype-methods/2-dictionary-tostring/task.md Resolved

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Comment thread 1-js/08-prototypes/04-prototype-methods/article.md Resolved

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Comment thread 1-js/08-prototypes/04-prototype-methods/article.md Resolved

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Comment thread 1-js/08-prototypes/04-prototype-methods/2-dictionary-tostring/task.md Resolved

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Comment thread 1-js/08-prototypes/04-prototype-methods/article.md Resolved

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Comment thread 1-js/08-prototypes/04-prototype-methods/article.md Outdated

```js
// fully identical shallow clone of obj
// clon superficial totalmente idéntico de obj

@joaquinelio joaquinelio May 25, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

no entiendo por qué puso shallow, es obj es simplemente "idéntico", nada más. salvo que signifique copia llana. no lo pondría. Tembién me molesta la redundancia del original, pero lo quiere sobresalir de la copia via loop que sí es superficial.

// clon totalmente idéntico de obj

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions

@cortizg cortizg May 30, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions

@EzequielCaste EzequielCaste May 30, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"shallow" es para identificar que no tiene objetos anidados en su interior

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

joaquinelio reacted with thumbs up emoji
All reactions
  • 👍 1 reaction

@joaquinelio joaquinelio May 30, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

¡AAAGGH!
DISCULPEN la falta de atención. metí un err donde no lo había
Debería poner un PR al inglés, poque "idéntico" confunde,
hay obj copiados superficialmente (es CORRECTA la palabra) por lo tanto NO idénticos,
y obj copiados recursivamente , IDÉNTICO y no superficial , creí que se refería a esto

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions

@cortizg cortizg May 30, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

¿seria entonces: clon superficial totalmente idéntico a obj?

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions

@joaquinelio joaquinelio May 30, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

PFFF
si yo estuviera estudiando esto, abandonaría

quizas sea que la capa superficial sí es idéntica
(porque podrías copiar solo prop y metodos y dejar sin copiar el resto)

No me animo a corregir, tengo que repasar el tema. Haciendo pruebas.
@ezzep66 sí parece entenderlo

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions

@EzequielCaste EzequielCaste May 30, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fully identical >> totalmente idéntico
shallow clone >> clon superficial
of obj >> de obj

clon superficial de obj totalmente idéntico
me parece...

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions

@cortizg cortizg May 30, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok: clon superficial de obj totalmente idéntico

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
Comment thread 1-js/08-prototypes/04-prototype-methods/article.md Resolved

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Comment thread 1-js/08-prototypes/04-prototype-methods/article.md Outdated
- [Object.setPrototypeOf(obj, proto)](mdn:js/Object.setPrototypeOf) - establece el `[[Prototype]]` de `obj` en `proto` (igual que el setter de `__proto__`).

The built-in `__proto__` getter/setter is unsafe if we'd want to put user-generated keys in to an object. Just because a user may enter "__proto__" as the key, and there'll be an error with hopefully easy, but generally unpredictable consequences.
El getter/setter incorporado de `__proto__` no es seguro si queremos poner claves generadas por el usuario en un objeto. Aunque un usuario puede ingresar `"__proto __"` como clave, y habrá un error, con consecuencias levemente esperanzadoras, pero generalmente impredecibles.

@joaquinelio joaquinelio May 25, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

( ) , y habrá un error, con consecuencias, con esperanza tranquilas pero generalmente impredecibles.

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions

@cortizg cortizg May 30, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions

@EzequielCaste EzequielCaste May 30, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yo diría
con consecuencias levemente fáciles, pero generalmente impredecibles.

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions

@joaquinelio joaquinelio May 30, 2020 •
edited
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

eehhhmm...
qué significa "levemente fácil". Definitiva y rotundamente y un completo CREO QUE NO :)

Uno pone el parche, potencialmente peligroso. entonces
"easy" acá no es "fácil" sino "suave" ("easy, boy" cuando tranquilizás al perro)
hopefully easy
"consecuencias que, esperamos, sean leves/imperceptibles/no dañinas."
"con suerte, consecuencias leves o nulas" menos literal

take it easy

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions

@cortizg cortizg May 30, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

se escucha mejor!

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
Comment thread 1-js/08-prototypes/04-prototype-methods/article.md Resolved

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Comment thread 1-js/08-prototypes/index.md Resolved

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@javascript-translate-bot javascript-translate-bot removed the review needed label May 25, 2020
@javascript-translate-bot

javascript-translate-bot commented May 25, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Please make the requested changes. After it, add a comment "/done".
Then I'll ask for a new review 👻

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@javascript-translate-bot javascript-translate-bot added the changes requested label May 25, 2020
@cortizg
revisión 2020-05-29
e8f41e7
@cortizg

cortizg commented May 30, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/done

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@javascript-translate-bot javascript-translate-bot added review needed and removed changes requested labels May 30, 2020
cortizg added 2 commits May 30, 2020 12:59
@cortizg
revision 2020-05-30
ad49226
@cortizg
revision 2020-05-30 2
9d22f63
joaquinelio
joaquinelio reviewed May 30, 2020
View reviewed changes

@joaquinelio joaquinelio left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ezzep66
"apruebo"
pero no me animo a "approve"
tengo miedo que haga un merge automático
¿seguimos alimentando el repo? ¿probamos, pongo approve y vemos si el bot hace merge?
porque todavía no sabemos como manejar el repo actual

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
@cortizg
revision 2020-05-30 3
0b52022
EzequielCaste
EzequielCaste approved these changes May 30, 2020
View reviewed changes

@EzequielCaste EzequielCaste left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
@javascript-translate-bot javascript-translate-bot added needs +1 and removed review needed labels May 30, 2020
@EzequielCaste

EzequielCaste commented May 30, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

1 change requested
@joaquinelio
joaquinelio requested changes

me queda colgado eso...

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

joaquinelio
joaquinelio approved these changes May 30, 2020
View reviewed changes
@joaquinelio

joaquinelio commented May 30, 2020 •
edited
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Aprobé sin leer jaja ¿está hecho? Lead this, @ezzep66 te dejo el merge porque en un punto me supera.
Siempre se puede corregir, si cabe.

el bot gerentea más de lo que pensaba,
el traductor debería poner comentario /done en lugar de "listo/ok", y el bot lo manda a rerevisar

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@vplentinax
Merge branch 'master' into es.javascript.info.1-08-04-pm
c1a6bfb
@vplentinax
vplentinax merged commit 39af0cc into javascript-tutorial:master Jun 3, 2020
@javascript-translate-bot

javascript-translate-bot commented Jun 3, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thank you 💖 I updated the Progress Issue #17 🎉 🎉 🎉

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@joaquinelio joaquinelio joaquinelio approved these changes
@EzequielCaste EzequielCaste EzequielCaste approved these changes

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

needs +1

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

5 participants

@cortizg @javascript-translate-bot @EzequielCaste @joaquinelio @vplentinax
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.