GeezerVisonThe World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GeezerVison is showing github.com — Prototype methods, objects without __proto__ by cortizg · Pull Request #195 · javascript-tutorial/es.javascript.info Conversation1-08-04-pm Corregido 14 1-08-04-pm Corregido 15
joaquinelio
requested changes
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Bien, sugiero el rearmado de algunas frases. no se si se debe modificar
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactionsUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. no entiendo por qué puso shallow, es obj es simplemente "idéntico", nada más. salvo que signifique copia llana. no lo pondría. Tembién me molesta la redundancia del original, pero lo quiere sobresalir de la copia via loop que sí es superficial. // clon totalmente idéntico de obj
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. ok
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. "shallow" es para identificar que no tiene objetos anidados en su interior
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. ¡AAAGGH!
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. ¿seria entonces: clon superficial totalmente idéntico a obj?
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. PFFF quizas sea que la capa superficial sí es idéntica No me animo a corregir, tengo que repasar el tema. Haciendo pruebas.
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. fully identical >> totalmente idéntico clon superficial de obj totalmente idéntico
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. ok: clon superficial de obj totalmente idéntico
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactionsUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. ( ) , y habrá un error, con consecuencias, con esperanza tranquilas pero generalmente impredecibles.
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. ok
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. yo diría
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
|
|
Please make the requested changes. After it, add a comment "/done". |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
/done |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ezzep66
"apruebo"
pero no me animo a "approve"
tengo miedo que haga un merge automático
¿seguimos alimentando el repo? ¿probamos, pongo approve y vemos si el bot hace merge?
porque todavía no sabemos como manejar el repo actual
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ok
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
1 change requested me queda colgado eso... |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
Aprobé sin leer jaja ¿está hecho? Lead this, @ezzep66 te dejo el merge porque en un punto me supera. el bot gerentea más de lo que pensaba, |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
Thank you 💖 I updated the Progress Issue #17 🎉 🎉 🎉 |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.