GeezerVisonThe World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GeezerVison is showing github.com — Data types by jonnathan-ls · Pull Request #243 · javascript-tutorial/pt.javascript.info Conversation
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
jonnathan-ls
force-pushed
the
fix/steps-types
branch
from
b27374e to
f579000
Compare
Contributor
Author
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Contributor
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. In line 73, the english sentence still in the file.
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
…t.info into fix/steps-types
|
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
Olá @renatocfrancisco, Obrigado pela observação, não tinha percebido ❤️ Olá @odsantos,
O PR contempla toda tradução do artigo, com exceção da linha 73 como citado pelo Renato Por desencargo, também atualizei com a master do repositório original. Poderia adicionar sua revisão a este PR? |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
Hi @jonnathan-ls , sim. Logo que possivel. Obrigado. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
@peruibeloko, @jonnathan-ls, what is missing in this pull request? |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
The review by two maintainers is missing, I will not contribute with the review, as the PR is precisely my own, there is no point in reviewing it myself @nazarepiedady Could you add your review? |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We could improve it more ahead, but for now, it is good enough to be approved.
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
@jonnathan-ls, now we need one more review. It should take some time because we are running under forces. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
@peruibeloko, are you available to review this pull request? |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Duas mudanças rápidas e está aprovado
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
| Em JavaScript, o tipo "number" não pode representar valores inteiros maiores que <code>(2<sup>53</sup>-1)</code> (que é `9007199254740991`) ou menores que <code>-(2<sup>53</sup>-1)</code> para negativos. É uma limitação técnica causada por sua representação interna. | ||
|
|
||
| For most purposes that's quite enough, but sometimes we need really big numbers, e.g. for cryptography or microsecond-precision timestamps. | ||
| Para a maioria dos propósitos, isso é o suficiente, mas às vezes precisamos de números realmente grandes, por exemplo, para criptografia ou carimbos de data/hora com precisão de microssegundos. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This section is duplicated at line 75
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Removed
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| You can check [*MDN* BigInt compatibility table](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/BigInt#Browser_compatibility) to know which versions of a browser are supported. | ||
| Você pode verificar a [tabela de compatibilidade do *MDN* BigInt](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/BigInt#browser_compatibility) para saber quais versões de um navegador são suportadas. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Você pode verificar a [tabela de compatibilidade do *MDN* sobre BigInt]
ou
Você pode verificar a [tabela de compatibilidade do BigInt na *MDN*]
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
Please make the requested changes. After it, add a comment "/done". |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
@jonnathan-ls, could you consider the reviews did? |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
/done @nazarepiedady I applied the requests noted by @peruibeloko, see commit 4a7029e. And I also added pending content that I noticed when accessing the article from the official English repository bigint-type session, see commit 7cafcbb |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It seems good enough to be approved.
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
Error: the article already translated in the Progress Issue #1 |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.