GeezerVison is showing github.com — Change one of the test domains for the DNS tests by dfangl · Pull Request #13333 · localstack/localstack
This repository was archived by the owner on Mar 23, 2026. It is now read-only.
Conversation
dfangl
commented
Nov 4, 2025
•
edited
Loading
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Motivation
Recent test failures showed the foo.something.org domain we used for testing resolving to an unexpected IP address. It seems the domain owner, a domain reseller, started resolving this domain to some IP.
Even though this seems to have changed again since, we should not take the risk in the future.
Fixes ENG-104
Changes
- Change
something.org to example.org in tests querying the name servers of a domain.
Tests
Related
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
LocalStack Community integration with Pro
2 files ± 0 2 suites ±0 33s ⏱️ - 1h 58m 33s
2 tests - 4 892 0 ✅ - 4 524 2 💤 - 367 0 ❌ - 1
4 runs - 4 892 0 ✅ - 4 524 4 💤 - 367 0 ❌ - 1
Results for commit 6515127. ± Comparison against base commit 4952b82.
This pull request removes 4892 tests.
tests.aws.scenario.bookstore.test_bookstore.TestBookstoreApplication ‑ test_lambda_dynamodb
tests.aws.scenario.bookstore.test_bookstore.TestBookstoreApplication ‑ test_opensearch_crud
tests.aws.scenario.bookstore.test_bookstore.TestBookstoreApplication ‑ test_search_books
tests.aws.scenario.bookstore.test_bookstore.TestBookstoreApplication ‑ test_setup
tests.aws.scenario.kinesis_firehose.test_kinesis_firehose.TestKinesisFirehoseScenario ‑ test_kinesis_firehose_s3
tests.aws.scenario.lambda_destination.test_lambda_destination_scenario.TestLambdaDestinationScenario ‑ test_destination_sns
tests.aws.scenario.lambda_destination.test_lambda_destination_scenario.TestLambdaDestinationScenario ‑ test_infra
tests.aws.scenario.loan_broker.test_loan_broker.TestLoanBrokerScenario ‑ test_prefill_dynamodb_table
tests.aws.scenario.loan_broker.test_loan_broker.TestLoanBrokerScenario ‑ test_stepfunctions_input_recipient_list[step_function_input0-SUCCEEDED]
tests.aws.scenario.loan_broker.test_loan_broker.TestLoanBrokerScenario ‑ test_stepfunctions_input_recipient_list[step_function_input1-SUCCEEDED]
…
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Test Results - Preflight, Unit
22 278 tests ±0 20 526 ✅ +1 16m 5s ⏱️ +42s
1 suites ±0 1 752 💤 ±0
1 files ±0 0 ❌ - 1
Results for commit 6515127. ± Comparison against base commit 4952b82.
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a good idea, thanks. A ticking time bomb that went off!
There are other mentions of something.org in test_dns_server_soa_record_suffix_matching, is it worth changing those to use example.org as well?
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Test Results (amd64) - Acceptance
7 tests ±0 5 ✅ ±0 3m 21s ⏱️ -2s
1 suites ±0 2 💤 ±0
1 files ±0 0 ❌ ±0
Results for commit 6515127. ± Comparison against base commit 4952b82.
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Test Results (amd64) - Integration, Bootstrap
5 files 5 suites 9m 22s ⏱️
26 tests 24 ✅ 2 💤 0 ❌
32 runs 24 ✅ 8 💤 0 ❌
Results for commit 6515127.
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There are other mentions of something.org in test_dns_server_soa_record_suffix_matching, is it worth changing those to use example.org as well?
I saw those, but they are only the value of the SOA entry, not the name queried, so I did not change it. It should not come into contact with the something.org nameservers, so I think we should be safe 👍
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Reviewers
1 more reviewer
simonrw
simonrw approved these changes
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
docs: skip
Pull request does not require documentation changes
notes: skip
Pull request does not have to be mentioned in the release notes
semver: patch
Non-breaking changes which can be included in patch releases
Milestone
No milestone
Development
Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
|