GeezerVisonThe World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GeezerVison is showing github.com — Update pgf baseline image for TeX Live 2025 by axel-j-larsson · Pull Request #32504 · matplotlib/matplotlib ConversationPR summaryFixes issue #29790. Also relates to PR #32478 . I investigated it and the PGF files generated by It appears that the difference is instead caused by updates in PDFTeX's rendering engine, and would as such not be anything directly caused by a bug in Matplotlib. As such, I determined the most suitable fix would be to update the baseline image. I have also checked the new baseline with TeX Live 2026, and it still passes there. However, the new baseline does instead fail for TeX Live 2024 (and presumably earlier versions as well). As such, the suitability of this PR depends on what which TeX Live version to support, and in extension which Ubuntu version to support (see #32478). AI DisclosureAI was used to help investigate the image difference and generate new PDFs directly with pdfLaTeX. However, the new baseline test results have been verified and reviewed manually. PR quality check
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Author
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Contributor
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
axel-j-larsson
force-pushed
the
fix-pgf-test-baseline-image
branch
from
1359e47 to
180b65c
Compare
iccir
reviewed
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I think this should be
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Additionally, can
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. As far as I can tell, pdflatex has used the same versioning format since mid 2005, so as long as a version that isn't older than that is used it shouldn't return
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Is there any danger of
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Using
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
Author
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Author
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
iccir
reviewed
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Checking I'm a bit confused, however - why are we checking for 1.40.26 or earlier and not requiring a newer version of TeX Live? If TeX Live 2025 is more widely used, I think that we should have tests / images that pass on it and then xfail on older versions.
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactionsThis branch has not been deployedNo deployments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
ReviewersAt least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. AssigneesNo one assignedLabelsProjectsMilestoneNo milestoneDevelopmentSuccessfully merging this pull request may close these issues. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up. Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required. |