GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — docs(reference): add openclaw to experimental flags table by MohammedAlkindi · Pull Request #3366 · microsoft/apm

Conversation

@MohammedAlkindi

@MohammedAlkindi Mohammed Alkindi (MohammedAlkindi) commented Oct 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

The experimental reference table listed 8 of the 9 FLAGS and omitted openclaw. This adds its row, with the registered description and a relative link to the OpenClaw guide.

Issue and approved scope

Issue: #2986

Fixes #2986

Human scope-approval comment: #2986 (comment)

Does this PR complete the issue, or what remains? It completes it.

Type of change

  • Bug fix
  • New feature
  • Documentation
  • Maintenance / refactor

Testing

  • Tested locally
  • All existing tests pass (docs checks only)
  • Added tests for new functionality (if applicable) (docs-only)

docs.yml steps run locally: test:links 14 pass, CLI docs contract tests 10 passed, npm run build and link checks clean, check_cli_docs.py 34/34, check_schema_ids.py 10/10.

Spec conformance (OpenAPM v0.1)

  • Spec edit: docs/src/content/docs/specs/openapm-v0.1.md updated
    (new/changed <a id="req-XXX"></a> anchor + prose + Appendix C
    row).
  • Manifest edit: docs/src/content/docs/specs/manifests/openapm-v0.1.requirements.yml
    updated.
  • Test edit: a @pytest.mark.req("req-XXX") test under
    tests/spec_conformance/ added or extended.
  • CONFORMANCE.{md,json} regenerated via
    uv run --extra dev python -m tests.spec_conformance.gen_statement
    and committed.
  • N/A -- this PR does not change OpenAPM-observable behaviour.

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
@MohammedAlkindi
docs(reference): add openclaw to experimental flags table
f01bd9e
FLAGS in src/apm_cli/core/experimental.py registers nine flags, but the
Available flags table listed eight. Add the missing openclaw row with the
registered description and a relative link to the OpenClaw integration
page, matching the copilot-app, canvas and external-scanners rows.

Refs microsoft#2986.
@MohammedAlkindi
Mohammed Alkindi (MohammedAlkindi) requested review from Daniel Meppiel (danielmeppiel) and Sergio Sisternes (sergio-sisternes-epam) as code owners October 23, 2026 03:20
Copilot AI balanced review requested due to automatic review settings October 23, 2026 03:20
Copilot AI reviewed Oct 23, 2026

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
@MohammedAlkindi Mohammed Alkindi (MohammedAlkindi) mentioned this pull request Nov 2, 2026
docs(reference): experimental flags table omits the openclaw flag #2986
Open
@sergio-sisternes-epam

Sergio Sisternes (sergio-sisternes-epam) commented Nov 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Thanks for contributing this documentation correction. Issue #2986 has an explicit scope-approval record, and this PR appears to implement that scope. The requested reviewers include Daniel Meppiel (@danielmeppiel) and Sergio Sisternes (@sergio-sisternes-epam). This is a recommendation for human review only, not merge or approval.


Generated by autopilot-pr-triage-worker. This comment is AI-generated and may contain errors.

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@sergio-sisternes-epam Sergio Sisternes (sergio-sisternes-epam) added area/docs-site docs/src/content (Starlight), README, doc generation. triage/recommended Automated advice completed; not human scope approval. type/docs Documentation change (prose, examples, generated reference). status/accepted Human scope approval; verify the issue's approval record and review contact before work. labels Nov 3, 2026

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

Copilot code review Copilot
Copilot review effort
Applies to this pull request for everyone.Learn more about Copilot code review.
Copilot left review comments
@danielmeppiel Daniel Meppiel (danielmeppiel) Awaiting requested review from danielmeppiel danielmeppiel is a code owner
@sergio-sisternes-epam Sergio Sisternes (sergio-sisternes-epam) Awaiting requested review from sergio-sisternes-epam sergio-sisternes-epam is a code owner

At least 0 approving reviews are required to merge this pull request.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

area/docs-site docs/src/content (Starlight), README, doc generation. status/accepted Human scope approval; verify the issue's approval record and review contact before work. triage/recommended Automated advice completed; not human scope approval. type/docs Documentation change (prose, examples, generated reference).

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

docs(reference): experimental flags table omits the openclaw flag

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

3 participants

@MohammedAlkindi @sergio-sisternes-epam
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.