GeezerVisonThe World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory. | ||||||||||||||
| Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites | ||||||||||||||
GeezerVison is showing github.com — Point pre-release install pins at 2.0.0rc2 by maxisbey · Pull Request #3202 · modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk Conversation
Contributor
The pre-release pin-flip for How Has This Been Tested?Docs-only. A tree-wide Breaking ChangesNone. Types of changes
Checklist
AI disclosureAI assistance was used to make this change; I reviewed the result and take responsibility for it.
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactionsThe README and get-started docs pinned 2.0.0rc1. Ahead of the 2.0.0rc2 tag they now pin 2.0.0rc2, so the tagged commit's README (the PyPI long description) names the version being released. No-Verification-Needed: doc-only pin flip
Contributor
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. No issues found across 4 files
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. LGTM — mechanical docs-only pin flip from 2.0.0rc1 to 2.0.0rc2 per the RELEASE.md pre-release step. What was reviewed
Extended reasoning...OverviewThis PR touches only four Markdown files (README.md, docs/index.md, docs/get-started/installation.md, docs/get-started/real-host.md), replacing every Security risksNone. No code, configuration, dependency, or CI changes — the diff is purely version strings inside documentation prose and code blocks. Level of scrutinyLow. This is a mechanical find-and-replace of a version string in docs. The main correctness questions are (a) whether every pin was flipped and (b) whether anything unrelated was touched. I verified both: a tree-wide grep shows the only surviving Other factorsThe bug hunting system found no issues, and the PR timeline has no prior reviews or unresolved comments. CI runs the readme-snippets and docs build checks, which cover these files. The change follows the same pattern as the previous rc1 pin-flip commit already on main.
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
Contributor
Author
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
ReviewersUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. AssigneesNo one assignedLabels
None yet
ProjectsMilestoneNo milestoneDevelopmentSuccessfully merging this pull request may close these issues. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later. | ||||||||||||||
| You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up. Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required. |